Christmas from the Bible?

What happens when we learn more about Christmas from our holiday decorations and songs than from the Bible? In this episode of Salty Believer Unscripted, Josiah Walker and Bryan Catherman discuss what happens when the Bible is not our source. Who are the Magi? When did they find Jesus? How many of them were there? There could have been 20 or more! They guys seek to answer these answer these questions from the Bible, and many more. Listen to Salty Believer Unscripted wherever you get your podcasts or listen here:

Subscribe to the Salty Believer Unscripted on your favorite podcast app, or use these links: RSS Feed | Google Podcasts | Apple Podcasts | iTunes | Amazon Music | Audible | Player FM | Stitcher | iHeartRADIO | Pocket Casts | Castbox | Podbean | Spotify | Podcast Addict

What is Advent?

Every Christmas, some Christians celebrate advent and some don’t. Some aren’t even sure what advent is. In this episode of Salty Believer Unscripted, Josiah Walker and Bryan Catherman discuss advent. What is it? Why should Christians celebrate it, or should they not? Where did it come from? Listen to this episode of Salty Believer Unscripted wherever you listen to podcasts or listen here:

Subscribe to the Salty Believer Unscripted on your favorite podcast app, or use these links: RSS Feed | Google Podcasts | Apple Podcasts | iTunes | Amazon Music | Audible | Player FM | Stitcher | iHeartRADIO | Pocket Casts | Castbox | Podbean | Spotify | Podcast Addict

SBU: Parables

In this episode of Salty Believer Unscripted, Josiah Walker and Bryan Catherman discuss parables. How do we interpret them? What does the parable of the dishonest manager mean? What does it mean to be faithful with a little? These seem simple but at times they stump us; how should we approach the parables of the Bible? As Josiah is preparing a sermons series in the parables so the guys discuss how to understand them. Listen to this episode, “Parables,” here:

Subscribe to the Salty Believer Unscripted on your favorite podcast app, or use these links:
RSS Feed | Google Podcasts | Apple Podcasts | iTunes | Amazon Music | Audible | Player FM | Stitcher | iHeartRADIO | Pocket Casts | Castbox | Podbean | Spotify | Podcast Addict

Systematic Theology: What is the Trinity?

On this episode of Salty Believer Unscripted, Josiah Walker and Bryan Catherman discuss the Trinity. What is it? Is it found in the Bible? How are we to understand it and what’s wrong with all the illustrations and analogies used to explain it? Subscribe to Salty Believer Unscripted wherever you listen to podcasts or listen to this episode here:

Subscribe to the Salty Believer Unscripted on your favorite podcast app, or use these links:
RSS Feed | Google Podcasts | Apple Podcasts | iTunes | Amazon Music | Audible | Player FM | Stitcher | iHeartRADIO | Pocket Casts | Castbox | Podbean | Spotify | Podcast Addict

Unscripted: Church and Politics

How involved should churches be in politics? What about having elected leaders speak in churches? On Sunday mornings or other times or never? What if a church member runs for office? These are all challenging and interesting questions that Bryan Catherman and Josiah Walker discussed on this episode of Salty Believer Unscripted. You can listen where ever you hear your favorite podcasts or listen here:

Subscribe to the Salty Believer Unscripted on your favorite podcast app, or use these links:
RSS Feed | Google Podcasts | Apple Podcasts | iTunes | Amazon Music | Audible | Player FM | Stitcher | iHeartRADIO | Pocket Casts | Castbox | Podbean | Spotify | Podcast Addict

Partisanship in the Church?

Partisanship is a strong preference or bias toward a particular group of people, cause, or belief. Sometimes it is said to be a blind adherence to a specific party, faction, or position. We often think of it in political terms, but it doesn't just live there. It's alive and active in many aspects of our life, especially in the Church.  

This five-minute TED Talk explains partisanship, including an interesting example of a math problem wrecked by partisanship, causing skilled mathematicians to get it wrong.  

Partisanship comes as a part of identifying with a social group. Being a part of a social group is essential for our identity and feelings of belonging. But cognitive dissonance can go too far, leading to partisanship that protects and defends social groups and individual identity rather than rightly handling truth. Critical thought breaks down. While it's easy to see this in politics today, it's also present in many aspects of the Christian community.   

Preferred Bible translation is one of many examples. Some people prefer one translation over another, which is reasonable. But some take it a step further. Rather than being okay when a pastor or biblical scholar points out a potentially poor decision in a translation, they defend the preferred translation at all costs. They become unwilling to examine other translations or allow the issue to live in a bit of tension. They may have no training or knowledge in the original languages or field of study, but that won't hold them back from ferociously protecting their preferred translation because, in many ways, they are protecting their choices which they feel gives them a social identity.   

In the 80s and 90s, Ford, Chevy, and Dodge truck owners were serious partisan defenders of their preferred pick-ups. Yet, looking back, these trucks were similar and did the same function regardless of brand. The same is true of smartphones -- iPhones or Androids- but even reading that will cause some to go into partisan battle mode.     

Eschatology (the study of end times) is another area where partisanship gets on steroids. People often defend a position not because of what they read in the Bible but because of what others they identify with have said. Soon enough, "those" books are evil and "these" books are great. Everything that person says on any topic is wrong because we disagree with their eschatological views.  Now people are in our out on all matters without regard to critical thinking.

Church planting and church planting methodology offer people a tribe or social identity. Still, when there are different ideas, partisanship creates new church-planting networks and new social tribes. Branding becomes a way of identification, so we end up with logos on backpacks, hats, coasters, fidget spinners, shoe laces, toothbrushes, and so on. These things have nothing to do with church planting and everything to do with social identity.  Now church planters are us or them, and everyone’s against the person who’s not engaged in church planting.

Musical style in worship had partisan fighting for many years. How the preacher dresses and if he's behind a pulpit or flat round table, at times, can get partisan. Don't overlook denomination and voluntary partnerships with mission organizations. We can undoubtedly find partisanship there. Evangelism methods. Choice of seminary or Bible college? Yup. These are all things that can be taken too far and wrongly defended along party lines.   

But let's be clear. First, none of the Christian activities and beliefs mentioned here are necessarily wrong. They are just subjects within Christianity where we can find partisanship. Second, we are all partisan at times. We have areas where we're quick to defend our camp and slow to think critically about the things we like. We blast other groups or ideas based on their worst days and judge our own by our best. Even while reading this post, you may have felt the need to respond about your 1980's truck or your smartphone, right? You may want to cancel everything here because I said something less favorable about church planting or end-times. But did I?  

If anything, we should be encouraged with the freedom to take a step back and evaluate our biases and partisanship. It's okay to look critically at our favorite things, just as we do with our least favorite things. We can still be a part of a social group with flaws. It’s okay. Our identity won’t be perfect—not even “instagram-perfect.” That's reality. We don't have to defend our side blindly or without engaging our minds. And we don't have to tear down others because of our bias.  

Maybe you owned a truck in the 80s. Cool. You liked it. Does it matter if someone else liked a different truck? So what if your favorite person owns a specific kind of phone? So your convictions about church planting are different than someone else who’s planting a church. So you like the ESV, and someone else in your study group reads the CSB, and still another person can't let go of her 1984 NIV that she's written 10,000 notes in since she got it from her mom in 1987 when she became a Christian. Does that hurt your social identity because you like the NKJV? Doesn’t it hurt your study or your understanding of the Bible that all of you are trying to know and live by?

We don't have to change everything overnight, but the first step is recognizing our biases. The next step is recognizing when our partisanship goes beyond any helpful place. And maybe just doing these two things will give us more joy in the Church with our brothers and sisters in Christ. And maybe, just maybe, it will bring more glory to God when we figure out we have the best identity we can have because we belong to Jesus.  

Systematic Theology: What is God Like?

What is God like? How can we know? Some argue that there’s nothing we can know about God while others take the approach that we can know everything about God. Some take the approach that we each invent God how we want him. Certainly others take a different approach. What does the Bible say? The question the guys on Salty Believer Unscripted is dealing with in this episode is, “What is God like?” You can listen to this episode of Salty Believer Unscripted here:

Subscribe to the Salty Believer Unscripted on your favorite podcast app, or use these links:
RSS Feed | Google Podcasts | Apple Podcasts | iTunes | Amazon Music | Audible | Player FM | Stitcher | iHeartRADIO | Pocket Casts | Castbox | Podbean | Spotify | Podcast Addict

Jesus Is the Law of Moses? Did The Chosen Get This Right?

Copyright image used under the fair use provision for criticism and critique.

Have you seen the season-three trailer for The Chosen? At the pinnacle moment of the trailer, when the building-music drops, a Pharisee threatens, "Jesus, if you do not renounce your words, we will have no choice but to follow the Law of Moses." Pause. Lean in. Wait for it... "I am the Law of Moses," says Jesus.  

It's dramatic, but is it biblically accurate? Is Jesus the Law of Moses? 

Of all the "I am" statements in the Bible, does Jesus ever say, "I am the Law"? No. He says all the Law and Prophets speak of him. He obeyed the Law perfectly in our place to redeem us. He fulfilled the Law completely. He faced the wrath promised in the Law. But he did not ever claim he was the Law.    

Given that Jesus said, "unless your righteousness surpasses that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will never get into the kingdom of heaven," we should think he wanted the Pharisees to follow the Law of Moses. If they weren't following it, they were disobedient. Jesus regularly called the Pharisees out for not following the Law of Moses. When asked about the Law, Jesus summarized it by saying it's loving God with all of our heart, mind, soul, and strength and loving our neighbors as ourselves" (Matthew 22:34-40 and Mark 12:28-34). Any moment we don't do this is a moment we're in sin, not following the Law. So while not as dramatic, maybe Jesus should have replied, "Yup, that's what I have been wanting all along." 

But this still leaves us with the question, is Jesus' line in The Chosen, "I am the Law of Moses," theologically correct?   

Hebrews 10:1-4 teaches the Law is but a shadow of the good things to come, falling short of saving us from sin or perfecting worshipers. The Law cannot and does not save us, but instead exposes our sin and our need for a Savior (see Romans 7). Romans 8:4 tells us God did what the Law could not do. If Jesus is the Law, then how did Jesus 'as the Law' fail? What could he not do? He didn't fail, and these verses juxtapose the Law and Jesus. Romans 8:2 says Jesus has set us free from the law of sin and death (talking about the Law of Moses.) If Jesus is the Law, like The Chosen trailer suggests, then this would be saying Jesus sets us free from Jesus. That is NOT what Romans 8:1-4 is teaching. Instead, we learn that Law condemns sin in the flesh, which demands our death. Yet, where we were sentenced under the Law because we fell short of the Law's requirement, God sent Jesus to live the Law perfectly and then be condemned under the Law in our place. In taking the full punishment of the Law, Jesus fulfilled the Law. (See also Romans 5.) Biblically speaking, it just doesn't line up to say Jesus is the Law. 

Now, the Bible does say Jesus is the Word, the revelation of the living God to his creation (John 1:1), but that is by no means the same as suggesting Jesus is the Law. Jesus is not the Law. There is a clear contrast between the Old and the New Covenants. There is a compelling difference between the Law that "came along to multiply the trespass" and the grace reigning "through righteousness, resulting in eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord" (Romans 5:20-21).   

Maybe The Chosen line is Hollywood flair, designed to entertain by eliciting emotion. Perhaps it's intended to keep Jesus' character from looking weak (which would also be biblically problematic). Or maybe the line is a direct quote from the Book of Mormon that says, "Behold, I am the law, and the light" (3 Nephi 15:9a).   

No matter the case, this theological confusion is no small thing.  

This claim is not a matter of acceptable artistic license, like which side of the boat Peter walked off or how clean their clothing might have been. Confusing Jesus' relationship to the Law of Moses will also cause confusion about justification, substitutionary atonement, grace, salvation, and who the biblical Jesus claims he is. It's a big question. It's a serious theological matter and one worth getting right. 

* Copyright image used under the fair use provision for criticism and critique.

Two Donkeys and a Fix-It-God

The missionary (I'll call him Randy) asked the mission conference attendees to pray. Randy needed the wisdom to solve a near-impossible problem. In one place where he serves, the team has to take a small boat up a river in the Amazon Rain Forest to get to a base camp, from where he launches a 20-hour hike into the jungle to train pastors who are ministering deep in the bush. The other alternative is to take a small airplane to land on the short grass runway at the base camp. I imagine the plane has to weave the trees and land just right to not crash at the end of the strip. He is looking for a way to get two donkeys to the base camp so they can use them to ease the burden of the 20-hour hike (and probably eat down the grass on the runway).

"Please pray for wisdom," Randy begged.

Now, if you're like most American Christians and me, you started thinking of ideas. Why not a helicopter? Or maybe you thought they could take baby donkeys on the canoe. One guy asked Randy if he'd thought about using four-wheelers or dirt bikes. In addition, people gave Randy the cash to buy eight more donkeys.

Because Randy and I were staying at the same hotel and I was his ride, I heard more of the story later. He asked us to pray, not solve the problem. Helicopters? Only if the military or drug dealers would help, and they won't. Four-wheelers won't fit on the trails, and there's the problem of transporting the necessary gasoline for dirt bikes. Baby donkeys? That might be an option, but there are concerns about the time commitment and the jaguars against defenseless babies. He may go with this option, but he's seeking God's direction before pulling the trigger. (He may need to get those eight extra donkeys if the jaguars have their way!) Randy and his team have thought of all these ideas and a few more, but they want God's help with the right answer.

Randy asked us to seek God's help in the problem, not be the fix-it-god ourselves. He knows God has all wisdom, and God has the best answer. Randy wants God's wisdom much more than ours. Maybe God will use one of us as a means to help Randy, but do you think he'll do it before we are even willing to pray?

I was thinking about solutions in my strength and power. Yeah, I thought about a helicopter. I hadn't prayed but was off to the races with ideas. And I'm sad to say; I thought I was the first to think of a helicopter. I was proudly patting myself on the back for my grand wisdom. If the 500 other people thought of it before Randy was even off the stage, why would any of us believe Randy hadn't thought of it?

Why are we so quick to try to solve problems for God before we even talk to God about the situation?

The next time someone asks you to pray, resist the temptation to fix the problem first. Make prayer--the thing you were asked to do in the first place--your chief priority. If God determines to use you in the solution, excellent!, but God will get the glory for it when we start with prayer. And that's how it should be.

SBU: The Canon

In this episode of Salty Believer Unscripted, Josiah Walker and Bryan Catherman discuss the Bible, specifically, how we know we have the right books. It’s a conversation about the Canon, the apocrypha, and other religious writings like the Book of Mormon. This episode is the third episode in a seres called Systematic Theology. Listen wherever you listen to podcasts, or listen here:

Subscribe to the Salty Believer Unscripted on your favorite podcast app, or use these links:
RSS Feed | Google Podcasts | Apple Podcasts | iTunes | Amazon Music | Audible | Player FM | Stitcher | iHeartRADIO | Pocket Casts | Castbox | Podbean | Spotify | Podcast Addict

Systematic Theology: Where Do We Start?

In this episode of Salty Believer Unscripted, Josiah Walker and Bryan Catherman ask the question, “Where do we start when doing systematic theology?” This is part of a series called Systematic Theology. Do we start with God or start with God’s Word. The Bible is God’s revelation to us, but do we start with the document or the God who wrote it? Listen to this episode wherever you listen to podcasts or listen here:

Subscribe to the Salty Believer Unscripted on your favorite podcast app, or use these links:
RSS Feed | Google Podcasts | Apple Podcasts | iTunes | Amazon Music | Audible | Player FM | Stitcher | iHeartRADIO | Pocket Casts | Castbox | Podbean | Spotify | Podcast Addict

The Miracle of Forgiveness (with Eric Johnson)

Eric Johnson, author of Introducing Christianity to Mormons: A Practical and Comparative Guide to What the Bible Teaches, met with Josiah Walker and Bryan Catherman to discuss how he uses an out-of-print Mormon book to witness to Mormons. The Miracle of Forgiveness is a book written by former LDS President and Prophet, Spencer W. Kimball. In it, Kimball is clear about what Mormons believe about grace, justification, and how to be saved. Johnson explains how that view differs from the biblical gospel and how he has conversations with people about it. Listen to Salty Believer Unscripted wherever you listen podcasts or listen here:

Subscribe to the Salty Believer Unscripted on your favorite podcast app, or use these links:
RSS Feed | Google Podcasts | Apple Podcasts | iTunes | Amazon Music | Audible | Player FM | Stitcher | iHeartRADIO | Pocket Casts | Castbox | Podbean | Spotify | Podcast Addict

SBU: What is Systematic Theology

What is Systematic Theology? Why is it important? How does it differ from other ways of doing theology? Salty Believer Unscripted is starting a new series called “Systematic Theology” where they’ll chat their way through some of the biggest doctrines of the Bible. In this first episode, they start with the question: “What is Systematic Theology?” You can listen to the episode, “What is Systematic Theology?” here:

Subscribe to the Salty Believer Unscripted on your favorite podcast app, or use these links:
RSS Feed | Google Podcasts | Apple Podcasts | iTunes | Amazon Music | Audible | Player FM | Stitcher | iHeartRADIO | Pocket Casts | Castbox | Podbean | Spotify | Podcast Addict

Introducing Christianity to Mormons (An Interview with Eric Johnson)

Eric Johnson, the author of Introducing Christianity to Mormons: A Practical and Comparative Guide to What the Bible Teaches (Harvest House, 2022), met with Josiah Walker, Bryan Catherman, and Robbie Tschorn on Salty Believer Unscripted. They discussed his new book, the Mormon faith, theology, evangelism, and how Johnson’s work could be helpful for Christians in the Utah area and far beyond. This was a two-part interview, and you can listen to both parts on Salty Believer Unscripted, or right here:

Part 1:

Part 2:

You can order your copy of of Introducing Christianity to Mormons wherever books are sold, or follow this link.

Subscribe to the Salty Believer Unscripted on your favorite podcast app, or use these links:
RSS Feed | Google Podcasts | Apple Podcasts | iTunes | Amazon Music | Audible | Player FM | Stitcher | iHeartRADIO | Pocket Casts | Castbox | Podbean | Spotify | Podcast Addict

An Example of the Near-Far Approach to Prophecy

More than a thousand pages have been published about Isaiah 7:14. It's an exciting and hotly debated verse, mainly because Matthew quoted it (from the LXX) about being filled by the birth of Jesus. 

"Therefore, the Lord himself will give you a sign: See, the virgin will conceive, have a son, and name in Immanuel" (Isaiah 7:14, CSB). 

I can say with great assurance that this verse was fulfilled when Mary was engaged to Joseph but became pregnant from the Holy Spirit. Her husband (Joseph) was righteous but going to divorce her quietly. But then an angel of the Lord appeared to Joseph in a dream and told Joseph that the baby was from the Holy Spirit. Joseph was told not to be afraid and that he must name the baby Jesus. Jesus, Joseph was told, will save his people from their sins. (See Matthew 1:18-21.) How do I know? Because Matthew said "all this" referring to what I just told you, "took place to fulfill what was spoken by the Lord through the prophet." Then he quotes Isaiah 7:14. 

Beyond what Matthew says, there are a lot of questions. 

First, the boy was NOT named Immanuel (neither was any newborn in the book of Isaiah), so in what way was 7:14 fulfilled? This tells me the fulfillment was not about the name itself but something more. 

Second, in Isaiah 7:14, the virgin named the child. In Matthew, Joseph was commanded to name the child. Furthermore, Matthew says, "they will name him Immanuel." Who is the "they"? His parents on the 8th day of his birth, or others? Is this about giving him his name or identifying him as Immanuel (which means "God with us" or "God is with us.") And then Joseph names Mary's baby Jesus, which is the Greek way to say Joshua, meaning "God is salvation," "God is deliverance," or "God saves."

Third, the prophetic statement was a sign to Ahaz about something he was to see so he would know to trust God (which he wasn't doing). God gave that prophecy through Isaiah sometime around 734-735 BC. If verse 15 means that before the boy eats solid foods (customarily the foods of the Promised Land), Aram and Israel would be destroyed, it's worth noting that Assyria sacked both those cities just a couple of years later. It's also helpful to consider that Isaiah 7:14 had to be fulfilled in some way during the life of Ahaz, or it calls God's reliability into question.

Fourth, it's rather curious that Isaiah and the prophetess (most likely his wife) gave birth to a child, and this is stated immediately following the prophetic sign to Ahaz. But God didn't tell Isaiah to name him Immanuel (like the situation with Joseph). Instead, he called him Maher-shalal-hash-baz (Isaiah 8:3-4). That name means "hurry spoil, be swift plunder." Before this child could speak, The king of Assyria would have the spoils of Damascus and Samaria. This looks a lot like a fulfillment (although maybe not the ultimate fulfillment) of Isaiah 7:14. Furthermore, we don't have Scripture or extra-biblical material where a prophet's wife is called a prophetess, unless she was indeed a called prophetess. We don't have anything suggesting Isaiah was married to a prophetess or that she was saying anything recorded in the Bible. HOWEVER, some commentators believe Isaiah saw her as the fulfillment of the Word of God and, thus, a living prophetess by example and act. 

Fifth, Isiah's wife wasn't a virgin like Mary, was she? How could she be the near fulfillment if she wasn't a virgin? Some suggest that she may have been a virgin at the time of the prophecy. Others point out the strange and challenging translation issues between the Hebrew and the Greek Septuagint. The Hebrew was a bit more ambiguous. The translators of the LXX went with an unambiguous word, "virgin," in 132 B.C. The word fits within the range of meaning, but it was on the fringes. However, it ended up being exactly right in reference to Mary. 

It's worth noting that there are many child references in this section of Isaiah. (7:3, 8:1-5, 8:18, 9:6-7; 10:19; 11:6, and 11:8) Why? Why is God using children and children being born as illustrations? Why are they signs? 

It's also worth noting that the issue in Isaiah had everything to do with trusting the Lord. Two strong nations were baring down on Judah. They were doomed to destruction. Yet God was calling his people to trust him. He would be with them. He would bring their salvation. Indeed, Matthew may have been tying destruction and salvation to the fulfillment, but just in case we missed it, a virgin would have a baby, and THEY would call him "God is with us." 

A couple of weeks ago, we discussed the near-far views of prophecy. This prophecy is an excellent example of near and far fulfillment. Isaiah and Ahaz were likely amazed by the near fulfillment and never realized there was a more wonderful far fulfillment. We get the benefit of seeing how God used the near fulfillment as an illustration and further explanation to help us understand the far fulfillment.

Outreach or Feeding the Stomach God?

A church should be doing outreach (Matthew 28:18-20). We should be concerned about the well-being of our community (Jeremiah 29:7). We should be caring for widows and orphans, right? (James 1:27). And we are called to feed the hungry, shelter the stranger, clothe the naked, care for the sick, and visit those in prison (Matthew 25:35-40). How are we doing?  

Do the verses I just shared mean that every child in a poor school district should get a free backpack full of school supplies? Should every church have a food pantry and a prison ministry? Are we to pay the rent of every homeless person or soon-to-be evictee who walks through the church doors? How many orphans can we adopt? Should we raise volunteers to build and run an orphanage? Are we called to raise funds to create a new hospital?    

I think the Bible's answer is. . . maybe. 

After Jesus had been teaching and preaching all day, he challenged his disciples to feed five thousand men, plus women and children (John 6:1-7). They couldn't, but then Jesus did. If we stopped there, we'd have a good argument for feeding people and nothing more. But there's a lot more to this biblical account. Let us consider Jesus' words to those same people the next day.  

When the large crowds found Jesus again, he rebuked them. He said, "Truly I tell you, you are looking for me, not because you saw the signs, but because you ate the loaves and were filled. Don't work for the food that perishes, but for the food that lasts for eternal life, which the Son of Man will give you, because God the Father has set his seal of approval on him" (John 6:26-27). Let us not forget that John said the signs that were recorded in the book of John serve to cause one to believe and have eternal life" (John 20:30-31). The feeding was among the signs, but they didn't seek Jesus because of the signs; they just wanted more bread.  

Furthermore, after missing the feeding sign, the people challenged Jesus to produce another sign and pointed out that Moses gave a sign by providing hungry people with manna (John 6:30-31).  

Jesus told the people that he is the bread of life, and they've already been given a sign. They had the Law and Prophets, and they just saw a miracle and heard Jesus' preaching, yet they still didn't believe. Even if someone came back from the dead to warn them, they wouldn't believe (Luke 16:31). Jesus told them how they could have eternal life, yet they grumbled, complained, and rejected Jesus (see John 6:30-66). The people were pleased enough to have their stomachs filled for another day but unwilling to give any thought to salvation or their eternal future (Philippians 3:19). 

Why did Jesus feed all these people?  

For the same reason. This is why Christians serve their community, tend to widows and orphans, feed the hungry, shelter the homeless, provide clothing, and visit people in prison. This is the foundation for social justice. It is a sign. It is so Jesus can be seen and people will have the opportunity to believe.  

If we give poor children school supplies, provide a thirsty person a cup of cold water, or visit people in prison because we see them and love them, we may demonstrate that we have a righteous heart. The unrighteous missed the suffering of their fellow humans and were numbered among the goats (Matthew 25:31-46). These are good acts, but let us be careful not to think these acts earn the righteous their salvation when they are only outward signs. Remember that these examples in Matthew 25 are not acts of outreach and evangelism.   

Having compassion for the least of these is good. But if we serve them so we can pat ourselves on the back and say, "See what we did in the Lord's name," we may be in great danger (Matthew 7:21-23). If our actions are for a photo opportunity, then we have our reward now, rather than in heaven; frankly, we've used the least of these to make ourselves look and feel righteous. We may not humbly see those who were suffering in a way that honors Jesus but instead see them as a means of promoting our self-righteous service.  

However, if we start by seeing the greatest needs of our neighbors (i.e., their eternal damnation) and do everything we can to share Jesus' message of salvation and hope with them, we may actually help them. It might be that a backpack full of school supplies or a bag of food, or a hospital helps us achieve this primary goal. Then we don't get excited about giving a child a backpack but instead use it like a door hanger or the 15-second story with the hope of sharing the gospel. The opportunity to see a child pass from spiritual death to spiritual life should drive our excitement for service.  

When it comes to outreach and evangelism, we must start with the gospel and evaluate our efforts by what will allow us to share the gospel. Maybe it's a series of steps. Giving a gift of support may enable us to hear a person's story and invite her to church, where she may listen to the gospel. Or it could be that it takes a few months of smaller steps. But we must have a clear idea of how the effort leads to sharing the gospel, or we've not helped them with their greatest need. Even worse, we may have simply enabled them to chase after Jesus to fill their belly and reject Jesus simultaneously. If we're not careful, we may facilitate a worse attitude toward Jesus and his Church--the ATM that doles out money if you have a big enough sob story.  

The answer to this problem is found at the conclusion of the story of the feeding of the five thousand. It's John 6:67-71. We're called to make disciples. John 6:68-69 is what a disciple says. Our outreach and evangelism should be set with that aim in mind. If we start with the gospel and measure by our efforts for the gospel (rather than the number of meals passed out), we'll do a lot more than feeding the people's physical hunger for a day; but as Jesus demonstrated, that's not a wrong step along the way. We have to keep the right things in the right priorities as we go.   

Pastors in Rhino Skin

"If you're going to be a pastor today," said the retired pastor sitting across the bistro table, "you've got to have skin as thick as a rhinoceros." It was one of those statements you hear echoing from the still places for days.

He wasn't talking about the mean words or unkind name-calling from the one-time guest or social media jabs. Those are easy. He wasn't even referring to that one difficult person that's always the thorn in the pastor's side. Nope. He was referring to the well-meaning people of the church with their various opinions and convictions that are precisely the opposite of the views and beliefs of other well-meaning people in the church.

I pastor a small church full of wonderful people. Yet, even in the church I'm a part of, there are Republicans and Democrats, home-schoolers and public school teachers, serious environmentalists and those still unconcerned. We have people who are convinced the rapture is happening next week, while others don't hold that view of the rapture or think that the lack of Oreos on the shelf is a sign of armageddon. Six-day creation and creation over thousands of years is a conversation just under the surface, waiting to bubble up into any conversation for some. I've met with people still worried about the dangers of CRT, while another would like to see more done and preached about racism and is convinced CRT is a reasonable way to think about the problem. Some argue with me that Christians shouldn't own guns, while on the other side of the wall, people are showing their friends pictures of their newest gun purchase.

On one Sunday I was told how wonderful it was that we had teenagers helping collect the offering with their parents, while at the same time, others were grabbing my attention to voice their offense that teens weren't dressed nicely enough to serve. Some like the rawness of my preaching, while others don't want specific words ever said in my sermons again. (At the top of the list are poo, Hitler, and nincompoop.) Some love the word studies and want to hear the Greek and Hebrew words, while others say that's the point when they check out because it's over their heads and not for regular people. I'm told we need to do more with our denomination, while others say, "Let's do less; who needs it." We're not doing enough to keep our kids' safe while at the same time, complaints come that we're too strict for being a little church.

When I need to make a decision, people will be unhappy—every time.

The challenges and the need for rhinoceros skin are not the people. It's the temptations. It's tempting to try to make the most people happy, or everyone if possible. Listening to the squeakiest wheel is easy, but pastors must listen to God. There's the temptation to try to protect unity when controversial topics arise in a dinner conversation, spoken with authority as if everyone around the table agrees on the latest issue. Letting the church bring drama into our faith family is not easy. The temptation is to try to be the peacekeeper. I want to protect the teens, shy ones, new Christians, and those who are sensitive to the issues. It's equally tempting to excuse myself from the table and check out. It's no wonder some pastors become aloof or have no friends at the church. It's no wonder some pastors never share their personal opinions or views.

It's not the outsiders' problems brought to the church that keep the pastor up at night. It's not the world beyond the walls that make the task so challenging. It's the world of the members in the pews, Sunday to Sunday. It’s the stark differences. This is the work that requires thick skin and firm resolve. Is it any more difficult today than it was in the past? I don't think so. But the statement remains true. Anyone wanting to pastor today must have skin as thick as a rhinoceros.

Tools for Better Bible Study: The Biggest Story Bible Storybook

Join Josiah Walker and Bryan Catherman as they discuss Kevin DeYoung’s newest project, The Biggest Story Bible Storybook. It’s illustrated by Don Clark. How can a children’s Bible help adults study the Bible better? How might this Bible assist parents in the task of discipling their children to know and follow the Lord? Would this be a good resources in a church, and if so, how? In this episode of Salty Believer Unscripted, the guys discus these questions and more. Listen wherever you enjoy your favorite podcasts, or listen here:

Subscribe to the Salty Believer Unscripted on your favorite podcast app, or use these links:
RSS Feed | Google Podcasts | Apple Podcasts | iTunes | Amazon Music | Player FM | Stitcher | iHeartRADIO | Audible | Pocket Casts | Castbox | Podbean | Spotify | Podcast Addict

Tools for Better Bible Study: The Jesus Storybook Bible

Join Josiah Walker and Bryan Catherman as they discuss the Jesus Storybook Bible by Sally Lloyd-Jones and illustrated by Jago. How can a good children’s Bible help adults to study the Bible better? Will any children’s Bible do? Why this particular children’s Bible? They answer these questions and many more in this episode of Salty Believer Unscripted. Listen to this episode, “The Jesus Storybook Bible” wherever you listen to your favorite podcasts, or listen here:

Subscribe to the Salty Believer Unscripted on your favorite podcast app, or use these links:
RSS Feed | Google Podcasts | Apple Podcasts | iTunes | Amazon Music | Player FM | Stitcher | iHeartRADIO | Audible | Pocket Casts | Castbox | Podbean | Spotify | Podcast Addict