Longing for Liturgy: What is Authentic?

Some might argue that high liturgy is a more authentic expression of faith and worship. Some might baulk at that assessment. What is authentic? In this episode of Salty Believer Unscripted, Josiah Walker and Bryan Catherman discuss high and low liturgy and where we can find authentic expression, or the lack thereof, in both. Subscribe wherever you get podcasts or listen here:

Subscribe to the Salty Believer Unscripted on your favorite podcast app, or use these links:
RSS FeedApple Podcasts | iTunes  | Amazon Music | Audible | Player FM | iHeartRADIO | Pocket Casts | Castbox | Podbean | Good Pods | Spotify | Podcast Addict | Pandora | Podchaser | Listen Notes | YouTube

Longing for Liturgy: An Introduction

Generation Z and Generation Alpha are looking for an authentic expression of faith. Many of them believe they are finding that in churches with high liturgy. Most don’t even know what liturgy is. What is liturgy? Is it bad to be liturgical? Why have some been afraid of more structured, high liturgy? We’re starting a series that walks through a conversation about liturgy in the local church. Everyone has a liturgy. What’s yours? Subscribe and listen wherever you get podcasts, or listen here:

Subscribe to the Salty Believer Unscripted on your favorite podcast app, or use these links:
RSS FeedApple Podcasts | iTunes  | Amazon Music | Audible | Player FM | iHeartRADIO | Pocket Casts | Castbox | Podbean | Good Pods | Spotify | Podcast Addict | Pandora | Podchaser | Listen Notes | YouTube

Putting Discipleship into Practice

Josiah Walker and Bryan Catherman finish up our “Dangerous Discipleship” series with a discussion about how they put discipleship into practice. They each share what they are doing to disciple others and offer additional ideas. There’s a discussion of Pilgrim’s Progress, men’s groups, and much more. Listen to this episode of Salty Believer Unscripted wherever you get podcasts or listen here:

Subscribe to the Salty Believer Unscripted on your favorite podcast app, or use these links:
RSS FeedApple Podcasts | iTunes  | Amazon Music | Audible | Player FM | iHeartRADIO | Pocket Casts | Castbox | Podbean | Good Pods | Spotify | Podcast Addict | Pandora | Podchaser | Listen Notes | YouTube

The Necessity of Having Multiple Streams of Discipleship

Many organizations and books contend for a strong discipleship model where one person is the disciple-maker and the other is the learner. The relationship is strong, but often there’s an avoidance of other avenues for growth. The solo discipleship path can be dangerous for both parties.

Join Josiah Walker, Bryan Catherman, and guest Kirk Galster as they discuss the dangers of having a single discipler and the value of having multiple streams of discipleship in your life. How do we have robust discipleship and growth? How does having numerous resources of discipleship protect us from problems and draw us closer to Jesus? These are some of the questions this discussion seeks to answer. Subscribe to Salty Believer Unscripted wherever you listen to podcasts or listen here:

Subscribe to the Salty Believer Unscripted on your favorite podcast app, or use these links:
RSS FeedApple Podcasts | iTunes  | Amazon Music | Audible | Player FM | iHeartRADIO | Pocket Casts | Castbox | Podbean | Good Pods | Spotify | Podcast Addict | Pandora | Podchaser | Listen Notes | YouTube

The Chiastic Structure of Luke 22:31-62

There are multiple ways to view and interpret Luke 22:31-62. The most obvious might be with the narrative tools of rising tension and conflict. The Use of character focus is helpful too. But have you ever considered the chiastic structure?

Luke 22:31-62 is a chiasm. The outer envelope is Peter's denial (31-34, 54-62). The next movement inward is Judas and the world's denial to be numbered among the transgressors (35-38, 47-53). Then the center of the chiasm is Jesus' prayer in 39-46.

Luke brackets the center section with Jesus' two-times statement: "Pray that you may not enter into temptation" (40, 46). Jesus faced the greatest temptation, asking that the cup might pass, but he would do God's will no matter what the temptation, even in the face of death. Peter acted like he would do this, too, but he failed. Judas didn't even try.

Going back to the outer section of the chiasm, we have Simon, who claims he's all-in no matter what, but then, at the end of the account, we see he fell to temptation. In the next layer in the chiasm, it's Judas who is tempted with the world to deny Jesus, going all-in against Jesus (37). The result is what we see in 47-53. Scripture had to be fulfilled, and we see the sword come into play wrongly. Once again, Peter acted on his temptations as if to fulfill what he claimed in the first part. It won't work that way. Judas' denial of Christ led others to follow Judas, aiding their rejection of Christ. Judas' denial is worse than Peter's denial. The picture is escalating in consequences. Worse of all would be if Jesus succumbed to temptation. Praise the Lord! He did not.

Peter's event with the sword demonstrates his idea of what it means to stand with Jesus. Fight? Go to the sword? Action in strength? But Jesus says that's not how it works. Instead, we stand by truth in word and deed, not being afraid to stand with Jesus even when he's on trial. Peter couldn't even do that much when a servant girl asked. (How strong are you now, Peter?)

A couple of things worth noting. First, Satan demanded to have Peter, and God could have said no. He did not. It looks like Job in many ways. In addition, God knew it was for Peter's and our good, because by reading this account, Acts, and Peter's writing, we see how God redeems his people. We also see how Satan is on God's leash.

Second, even Jesus needed strengthening in and after his temptation. Verse 43 shows that God sent an angel to help Jesus. God sends the Holy Spirit to support and strengthen us. Jesus models how we get through temptation through prayer and reliance on God--not by strength, as Peter tried.

The growing plot and resolution leave everything unresolved until after the resurrection. That's not a wrong approach to this Passage, but the chiasmus approach lets you stay in more of this Text without going to the end to resolve the tension.

One of the most beautiful pictures of the Gospel comes in verse 32. Jesus knows Peter will fall, but because Jesus knows Peter is in Christ, he also knows he will turn again (repentance) and then strengthen his brothers (the fruit of being in Christ). Nothing in this statement implies that Peter will lose his salvation, and everything requires that Peter is indeed already saved. This foundation goes back to another time when Jesus was praying in Luke 9:18-20. In verse 20, Peter confesses that Jesus is the Christ of God. That's how Peter was saved, by faith. So, although Satan is going to sift Peter (31), and Peter is going to sin terribly, Peter sees the problem and weeps bitterly (62). Judas seems not to understand repentance. Judas never fell--he was never with them in the first place. What an encouragement for those who know Christ. What a call for those who do not.

How to Select Discipleship Resources

Discipleship is important, but when you don’t know where to start, it can be daunting. There are thousands of resources out there. How can we sift through it all and find what’s going to be the most helpful? It’s not magic. There are some simple steps that will prove helpful. In this episode of Salty Believer Unscripted, Bryan Catherman and Josiah Walker walk through steps to help discern which resources are better and which should be avoided. Subscribe and listen wherever you get podcasts, or listen here:

Subscribe to the Salty Believer Unscripted on your favorite podcast app, or use these links:
RSS FeedApple Podcasts | iTunes  | Amazon Music | Audible | Player FM | iHeartRADIO | Pocket Casts | Castbox | Podbean | Good Pods | Spotify | Podcast Addict | Pandora | Podchaser | Listen Notes | YouTube

The Danger of Christian Social Media Influencers

In this episode, Josiah Walker and Bryan Catherman discuss the dangers and the benefits (if there are any) of Christian social media influencers. When it comes to discipleship, what contribution are the famous online disciple makers making to the Christian? How has this social media trend changed discipleship? What do we do with the “fanboys”? Are we exercising caution with rage-bait posts or just eating it up? How social media influencers shape and change the way we view our local pastors? Do we need to rethink our favorite social media heroes? That’s the topic of this conversation. Subscribe and listen to this episode wherever you get your favorite podcasts, or listen here:

Subscribe to the Salty Believer Unscripted on your favorite podcast app, or use these links:
RSS FeedApple Podcasts | iTunes  | Amazon Music | Audible | Player FM | iHeartRADIO | Pocket Casts | Castbox | Podbean | Good Pods | Spotify | Podcast Addict | Pandora | Podchaser | Listen Notes | YouTube

Dangerous Discipleship: The Disaster of Social Media Discipleship

Robot looking back at the user.

In this episode of Salty Believer Unscripted, Josiah Walker and Bryan Catherman take a hard look at the pros and cons of social media in relation to discipleship. What’s dangerous and why is it a problem? Is the algorithm serving the mission of Romans 12:1-2 or doing something else? How does doom scrolling serve God, if it does? Can it? Is there any redeeming value to social media? How is our phone conforming us to the world? This is the topic of conversation in Episode 2 of our series “Dangerous Discipleship.” Subscribe and listen to the Salty Believer Unscripted wherever you listen to podcasts or listen here:

Subscribe to the Salty Believer Unscripted on your favorite podcast app, or use these links:
RSS FeedApple Podcasts | iTunes  | Amazon Music | Audible | Player FM | iHeartRADIO | Pocket Casts | Castbox | Podbean | Good Pods | Spotify | Podcast Addict | Pandora | Podchaser | Listen Notes | YouTube

Dangerous Discipleship: Thoughts on Kirk and the World Today

An image of a yellow danger sign.

This episode of Salty Believer Unscripted kicks off a new series titled “Dangerous Discipleship.” We’re starting this series with a discussion on the ramifications of the Charlie Kirk murder, internet discipleship, and how the world is shaping Christians. It may be helpful to pause to think more deeply about how social discipleship is impacting nearly everyone, regardless of faith. The bigger question is, “How does all of this affect Christians?” How long has the internet been used to disciple Christians, and what role have internet personalities played in this process? What’s the present response? How should we respond? What’s the better answer? In this series, we discuss these questions and many more. Please consider subscribing to the podcast and listen to this series or listen here:

Subscribe to the Salty Believer Unscripted on your favorite podcast app, or use these links:
RSS FeedApple Podcasts | iTunes  | Amazon Music | Audible | Player FM | iHeartRADIO | Pocket Casts | Castbox | Podbean | Good Pods | Spotify | Podcast Addict | Pandora | Podchaser | Listen Notes | YouTube

Thoughts on Luke 21:5-38

There are Passages in our Bibles that get people worked up about the future, misdirected about what to do in the meantime, and off the guidance Jesus gave his people for living in the end times. Luke 21:5-38 is one such passage. What’s being said here? How should Christians understand this Text? Here are some brief thoughts to get the conversation started.

Luke 21:5-7 creates the setup for everything that follows in the Passage. Jesus points out that the adornments of the Temple they were admiring won't last, and in fact, will be destroyed. They ask when, but they also ask for the warning signs.

"These things" or "all this" (vv. 7, 9, 12, 28, 31, 36) hold the structure together and tie everything Jesus is answering to the two questions the discipled asked: "when will these things happen, and what will be the sign these things are about to take place. In the answer "these things" refers back to the statements that prompted the questions: "the days will come when there will not be one stone left apon another that will not be thown down." Jesus had previously mentioned no "stone on another" in Luke 19:41-44, where he gives more details about the specifics, which seem to point to the events of A.D. 70. However, in verse 9, Jesus states that the end will not come at once, suggesting that there is a progression, including an order that begins with things that must take place "first."

Furthermore, specific shifts in language suggest that there are two horizons in view — one close and one in the distance. Specific language like "you will be brought before kings" (21:14) and "when you see Jerusalem surrounded" (21:20) points to a near horizon. Yet, verse 27 seems to point to the Great Day of the Lord, promised in Daniel 7:13. There is a pronoun shift from "you," referring to the disciples and their lifetime, to "they," referring to a time in the future. Luke seems to overlap these horizons at times. While some events start closer in time to this Passage and others are further away, they all seem to fall within the end.

There are significant imperatives, mostly clustered together in this Passage. "See that you are not led astray" (21:8), "do not be terrified" (21:9), "settle it," that is, don't prepare a defense (21:14), "flee" and "do not enter" (21:21), "straighten up" (21:28), "rasie your heads" (21:28), "look" (21:29), "know" (21:31), "watch yourselves" (21:34), "stay awake" (21:36), and "pray" (21:36). While there are some instructions when he discusses the destruction of the Temple and city, most of these instructions fall toward the end after he has explained what will happen. It's a pastoral instruction, not just a statement about the end times or instructions about what to watch for. It's his pastoral instruction for how to live in light of the coming end and his return. It follows much of the same teaching that has led up to this point — live in this way and stay ready.

The structure contrasts what falls (stones, heaven, and earth) with what stands (his Word), bringing great weight to trusting and obeying his Word. Jesus shifts the focus and emphasis away from sign-watching and places it on the imperatives of taking up vigilance, prayer, and endurance. Luke wants his readers to trust in the certainty of Jesus' Word and adopt a posture of faithful endurance, regardless of the signs. He certainly doesn't want us to become enthralled with the speculation of signs. Therefore, we too should shift our focus from watching for the signs to maintaining vigilance, prayer, and endurance, regardless of when the signs appear.

There are fantastic grounds for assurance for those who are in Christ found in this Text. "For I will give your mouth wisdom" (21:15), "none of your adversaries will be able to withstand" (21:15), "not a hair of your head will perish" (21:18), and "by your endurance you will gain your lives" (21:19). This Text should not cause the Christian any worry or fear of what's coming.

Much of what Jesus says in this Text echoes Daniel. It may be more than simply fulfilling the proof texts. It may be that the circumstances for the Christian in this age resemble those of Daniel and the Jews during Daniel's time. They were living in a land that was not their home and encouraged to look with great hope for the future, longing for home, trusting that God would care for them, and remain faithful (like Daniel and his friends who went to the furnace). They didn't fully understand what was happening in the future, and they didn't spend all their time trying to figure it out. They gave their energy to remaining faithful in the moment.

The Gospel gives us great hope. Without it, the destruction of the Temple would signal nothing but doom and despair. But because of Christ, the perfect sacrifice, and his crucifixion, the people of God can be relieved. Something (someone) better than the Temple is here. At the point when Jesus spoke, they still had great reason to feel the tension of coming judgment, but in Christ, they could find hope. Today, we still see our hope in Jesus. Jesus calls his people to endurance, but this is only possible because of the Gospel and the gift of the Holy Spirit--without these, there would be no way to endure. And it's terrific to see the Son of Man promised in Daniel, revealed in Luke and Acts, and glorified in Revelation.

Luke 21:5-38 is encouragement and a charge for Christians. Stand firm and endure by trusting in Christ's unfailing Word until our complete redemption dawns.

Budget Bibles

In this episode of Salty Believer Unscripted, Josiah Walker and Bryan Catherman discuss budget Bibles. What are the least expensive Bibles, and why should people use and have these? What makes them inexpensive? What should we know about the budget Bibles? What do we do with inexpensive Bibles we’re no longer using? These are the questions the guys are discussing. Subscribe and listen wherever you get podcasts, or listen here:

Subscribe to the Salty Believer Unscripted on your favorite podcast app, or use these links:
RSS FeedApple Podcasts | iTunes  | Amazon Music | Audible | Player FM | iHeartRADIO | Pocket Casts | Castbox | Podbean | Good Pods | Spotify | Podcast Addict | Pandora | Podchaser | Listen Notes | YouTube

Help Me Share the Gospel: A Quick Evangelism Tutorial

A Christian in love with Jesus doesn’t need to appeal to Matthew 28:16-20 as a reason to share the Gospel because we love to talk about who or what we love. That being said, most of us still need a little guidance when it comes to evangelism; that is, we need help knowing how to share our faith with someone who has not yet surrendered to and been redeemed by Jesus.

There’s a brief “getting started” video about sharing the gospel:

After watching the “getting started” video, you may want more instruction. The next two videos are, first, a demonstration of the 3 Circles Gospel sharing method (with Brett Ricley). Part 2 of the demonstration is a discussion of Scriptures for every part of the presentation.

But the Gospel is not only for those who need to believe. The Gospel is for Christians! Here’s a demonstration about how to use the Thee Circles method to preach the gospel into your soul every day. It’s for Christians.

Finally, here are some other Gospel presentations to help you think about how you might share the Gospel with others.

Thus Says the Lord, Today?

What am I supposed to think when someone claims, "God told me"? Should I believe them? Is this any different than cult leaders or false prophets? Answers to these questions have a great deal to do with how we understand God's revelation to His people when he was dual-authoring the Bible compared to today. How do we understand God breathing out his Word?

Outside of Christianity, we find the TV-type prophets, the LDS and Jehovah's Witnesses founders, and those claiming to be modern-day Apostles representing God to the entire world. These individuals often avoid appealing to Scripture for themselves because there is a greater likelihood that others will use the same Scriptures to claim the office of Prophet. Instead, they appeal to an "internal witness" that's hard to verify. It's a story about how God appeared to them. When we hear their claims, we should test them against Scripture. Is it another gospel (Galatians 1:8-9)? Do these people have a strong doctrinal fidelity to the Triune God and the true Christ (1 John 4:1-3)? Are these cliamants obeying the already-given Word (Deuteronomy 13:1-5, 18:20-22, 2 Timothy 3:16-17, and Revelation 22:18-29)? Do these "teachers" demonstrate Godly fruit and character (Matthew 7:15-20)?

It's easy to discuss those outside of biblical Christianity. How should we think about those holding views within orthodox Christianity? Interpretations fall along a spectrum. On one end is the Continuationist/Charismatic. On the other end is the Cessationist. Between these poles is the Open-But-Cautious Christian. However, don't think there are only three views; when, in fact, this is a spectrum with many different ideas falling somewhere along a diverse line.

The Contiuatioist will claim that God may guide and illuminate his Word today through impressions and prophecies, but all of these words must be weighed against Scripture. The Charismatic might appeal to Acts 13:2, 20:22-23, 1 Thessalonians 5:19-22, and 1 Corinthians 14:29. Most who understand God speaking today who fall in this category will likely still argue that a word from God must still be submitted to the church and seek guidance from Scripture.

An Open-But-Cautious Christian might argue that the Holy Spirit prompts and guides, but never contrary to Scripture and never with apostolic authority. It's not for all Christians, and it's not equal to the Bible. Everything said to be modern words from the Lord must be humbly tested in community by other brothers and sisters in Christ. Those who hold to this view might appeal to Acts 15:28, Romans 8:14, Galatians 5:16–25, and 1 Thessalonians 5:19–22.

Finally, a Cessationist claims that the revelatory gifts (such as propheticly getting a word from God) have ceased with the Apostles. A Cessationist might argue that "God told me" might be misleading language and is imprecise. The Cessationist appeals to Hebrews 1:1-2, John 16:13, Ephesians 2:20, 2 Timothy 3:16-17, and Revelation 22:18-19.

Regardless of which camp one might be coming from, it's wise to test anything said by one claiming it's from God. Test it. Does it agree with Scripture (Isaiah 8:20, Galatians 1:8–9, and 2 Timothy 3:16–17)? Does it uphold the faithful Christ and the gospel (1 John 4:1-3, 1 Corinthians 15:1-4)? Is it humbly submitted to the church for testing (Acts 15:28, 1 Thessalonians 5:19-22, and 1 Corinthians)? Does the character of the claimant match wisdom from above (Matthew 7:15–20, Galatians 5:22–23, and James 3:17)?

There's a triage process in place for determining how to deal with individuals who claim to have heard God speak to or through them.

The first category is the Wolves and manipulators. They are either outside orthodoxy or domineering inside the church. Publicly reject them, warn the flock, and bar them from teaching. If in membership and unrepentant, proceed to church discipline (Romans 16:17–18, Titus 3:10–11, 2 Peter 2, and Jude). Their track record and refusal to submit are the key points here, not a single bad guess.

The second category is the brothers or sisters who engage in sloppy "prophecy-talk." For these, correct with the doctrine. Show them that Scripture alone binds. Prophecy—if you believe it continues—is weighed and can be wrong. Call for repentance. Seek to repair any harm done. This would be another circumstance in which the person should be restricted from teaching until the matter is corrected. Regardless of which viewpoint you are coming from, teaching takes precedence over prophecy and must govern practice. Re-evaluate over time and remember that fruitfulness and humility should prevail (Matthew 7:16 and 1 Peter 5:5).

The final category is the ordinary Christians, who confuse impressions with revelation. This is a place for pastoral gentleness and care. Encourage prayer, Scripture, counsel, and prudence (Romans 12:2 and James 1:5). Teach them the difference between guidance through the Word and mystical impulses that bypass it.

Breaking Up With Facebook

Hey friends and family, if we were friends on Facebook but we're not now, it's not because we aren't friends. If I haven't accepted a request to connect, it's nothing personal; it's not about you. It's Facebook.

The current state of society is, in part, a result of the discipleship of social media. Doom scrolling a steady stream of algorithm-fed garbage is far too high a cost to connect with friends on a social platform that buries them in an avalanche of advertisements and unsolicited materials. My mental health and well-being can no longer take the curated echo chamber of bait, bent on detaining my attention and shaping my thoughts. I'm worn down.

My first attempt to fight back was to stream down my contact list and reduce the groups I follow. In theory, I would see more of what I wanted. Instead, the machine just filled my social feed with more of what it desired I eat. Whether I wanted it or not was irrelevant.

I no longer want to be discipled by social media. I no longer wish to be part of the problem. And I am tired of the addiction and the brainwashing. I'm divorcing myself from the abuse.

At this point, I would love to terminate my Facebook account just as I have with MySpace, Instagram, Twitter (X), LinkedIn, Threads, Google Buzz, NextDoor, Foursquare, and the like. However, I live in a small community that relies heavily on Facebook to disseminate city information, business closures, weather reports, police updates, movie times, and much more. Furthermore, I have work responsibilities tied to Facebook. So I can't terminate the machine yet.

Therefore, I still have a Facebook account, but I use it exclusively for my life in Holdrege, Nebraska.

If we are no longer connected on Facebook, that does not mean we are not friends. It does not mean we can't connect. Shoot me a call or text. Send an email. Write a letter. I may be willing to communicate on other peer-to-peer apps, but no guarantees. If you’d like to follow me, I think that’s a Facebook option. Knock yourself out.

People were friends long before Facebook. It's debatable if they will be after Facebook is gone, but we can certainly hope.

See you out there, my friends.

A New Bad Analogy for the Trinity

A yellow fidget spinner on a white background.

We love our analogies for the Trinity, but they never stack up. There’s nothing inside creation that explains our triune God who transcends creation. Many popular analogies fall short and dance in heresy. Our intentions are good when we want to try to explain the Trinity, but we often do more harm than good when we use a bad analogy. In light of a new analogy circulating around social media, the guys decided to discuss bad analogies for the Trinity. Subscribe to Salty Believer Unscripted wherever you get podcasts or listen here:

Subscribe to the Salty Believer Unscripted on your favorite podcast app, or use these links:
RSS FeedApple Podcasts | iTunes  | Amazon Music | Audible | Player FM | iHeartRADIO | Pocket Casts | Castbox | Podbean | Good Pods | Spotify | Podcast Addict | Pandora | Podchaser | Listen Notes | YouTube

Why Theology?

I already have the Bible and the Holy Spirit; why should I study theology? Given what we think about the answer to this question, how should we approach the study of theology?

The answer to these questions is not as straightforward. There are different approaches, and some even argue with Scripture.  

Two approaches fall outside of orthodox Christianity, although they are widely popular among those who identify as Christian. The first is to think that there is no need to study theology whatsoever. Those who argue this appeal to verses like John 14:26 and 1 John 2:27. However, who's to say their understanding of these Scriptures is correct? With this approach, even our view of Scripture is slippery. Why appeal to it at all? Those who hold to this approach argue that they have Jesus and the Holy Spirit, but without any study of God, what exactly is Jesus, and what is the Holy Spirit they are appealing to? See the problem? Everyone is a theologian. This approach is subjective and dangerous.

The next approach is the experiential or mystical illumination approach. Additionally, outside of orthodox Christianity, this view holds that the Spirit directly illuminates believers beyond Scripture, rendering Scripture or the study of Scripture less necessary. It's less about doctrine and more about an encounter. Those who defend this approach to theology may appeal to John 16:13 or 1 Corinthians 2:10, but not above personal experience.

A third approach to theology is the ecclesial tradition, which is typical among Roman Catholics and the Eastern Orthodox. In this line of thinking, the Bible and the Spirit are not enough to engage in good theological study; you also need the Church's magisterium or tradition (Church Fathers) to serve as both the proper interpreter and the proper guide rails. Proponents appeal to Scriptures such as 2 Thessalonians 2:15 and Matthew 16:18-19. While most consider this view within Christian orthodoxy, it often elevates tradition to the level of Scripture.  

A fourth approach — often referred to as classical Protestantism — views theology as human reason applied to Scripture. Here, the Bible is authoritative, but theology organizes, clarifies, and defends it. As Anselm would argue, theology is faith seeking understanding. Many reformed theologians hold this view, including men like Calvin, Berkhof, Hodge, and Grudem. The PCA is grounded in this approach to theology, even appealing to the WCF 1.6 that states, "The whole counsel of God concerning all things necessary for his own glory, man's salvation, faith and life, is either expressly set down in Scripture, or by good and necessary consequence may be deduced from Scripture…" Biblical warrant is grounded in Passages like Acts 17:11, Titus 1:9, and 2 Timothy 1:13. This view of theology recognizes both Spirit and Scripture, but also that God gave the Church teachers (Ephesians 4:11-12).

As people think of a healthy church model, there's yet another way to consider theology. In this case, theology serves as the necessary guardrails to interpretation and practice in the local church. Theology matters because churches cannot be healthy without the right doctrine. Under this thinking, theology is not ivory-tower speculation, but it is what builds, guards, and grows God's people. This is the approach of D.A. Carson, the EFCA, and 9Marks. Proponents appeal to Ephesians 4:11-14 and 1 Timothy 4:16. One of the greatest strengths of this view is that it connects theology to discipleship, membership, and witness.

Everyone does theology; the only question is whether you'll do it carefully, biblically, and humbly. At the end of the day, everyone is a theologian.

As one considers how to do theology, another question arises. Is it arrogant to think we can definitively write down doctrines that try to explain God's revelation to us?

The suspicion is that writing doctrines or confessions puts human words over God's Word, or that we presume too much in defining what God has revealed. That concern is not ridiculous or unreasonable. Confessions can be misused. But biblically and historically, the Church has always written doctrine. The real arrogance is pretending we don't need clarity.

There is great value in Faith Statements, good theological practice, and knowing theology. First, these bring clarity for the Church. A confession isn't adding to Scripture; it's saying, "Here's how we understand what Scripture teaches." This helps churches know what they are united around (Amos 3:3). Second, these promote unity and serve as guardrails. Shared doctrine unifies believers around essentials and draws lines against error (Ephesians 4:13-14). Third, faith statements and sound doctrine serve as a witness to the world. Doctrinal statements inform outsiders: "This is what we believe and why we believe it" (1 Peter 3:15). And finally, good faith statements and thorough study of theology will guard future generations. Written confessions preserve the faith "once for all delivered to the saints" (Jude 3) for those who come after us.

Thoughts on Luke 19:11-27

In Luke 19:11-27, Jesus shifts from speaking plainly, in clear language, back to using parables. Verse 11 hints that their proximity to Jerusalem may be, in part, the cause; however, the other reason is that the hearers (most likely the grumblers who were giving Jesus and Zacchaeus grief) asked about the immediate restoration of the Kingdom. The parable is about the Kingdom, and it seems that the consummation is the primary focal point.

In this parable, there is a nobleman who will become King, his servants/slaves, citizens who hate the nobleman and do not want him to rule over them, and someone who will both hear the citizens' delegation and give the nobleman the kingship. The nobleman gave clear instructions to his servants in verse 13: "Engage in business until I come." He did not say "keep my investment safe or make more money for me." When the man returned, now a king, he called his servants to ask what they had gained by doing business (verse 15). He was not asking how much more money they made or if they kept the money safe, but what they gained. Those who were faithful received substantially more, but the more was not the money. It was their ability to rule alongside the King, given responsibilities over entire cities. They also seemed to be allowed to keep the money, as evidenced by verse 25, where it is noted that when the first servant received the extra mina from the unfaithful servant, he already had 10, implying that he didn't have to receive even more. Their reward was not more money, but the trust and partnership of the King.

Furthermore, it was never their money. The King gave them money and asked them to engage in business. So they didn't have the option to do whatever they wanted with it because it wasn't theirs. They had instructions, and the money was just the resources they needed to complete the task they were asked to undertake. They clearly understood it was not their money because all three servants referred to it as "your mina" to the King (16, 18, and 20). They were stewards.

There were 10 servants in verse 13, but we only hear about three of them. The assumption is that nine servants were likely faithful. We didn't need to listen to the entire report to understand the pattern. The unfaithful servant believed the King was severe. There's nothing in the responses of the other servants that sounds like this, so this servant is more like the wicked citizens than the other servants.

Furthermore, the King doesn't say that the servant is right about the King, but that the King would use the servant's own words to judge him. Even based on these words, the servant didn't obey the instruction--to engage in business. The servant's unfaithfulness exposes his unbelief. That's what got him judged, not the success or failure in making more money. He didn't trust the Master enough to obey him. It's about faithfulness, not financial results. Therefore, the servant is deemed "wicked" by the King (verse 22). That being said, the King did not throw this servant into the lot with the citizens for destruction. The King called him wicked, yet he was not identified as an enemy of the King. The enemies were those citizens who did not want the nobleman to be King. It implies the unfaithful servant was still a servant of the King, but to him, more was NOT given. That may be an overreading of the parable, but it is interesting and worth more study.

This parable is Jesus' answer to a question about the coming Kingdom. He had already said that the Kingdom would not come as they expected or could observe (Luke 17:20). His disciples ask Jesus the same question after the resurrection — probably assuming it was then that he would be the earthly King of their expectations — but he gives them an interesting answer. Be my servants and bring in the Kingdom by sharing Jesus' good news. (Acts 1:6-8). Faithfully engage in Jesus' business.

Thoughts on Luke 18:9-30

The emphasis of Luke 18:9-30 is evident in the passage's structure. Luke opens with a parable, moves to an illustration, then to a narrative encounter that climaxes with the main point in verse 27: "What is impossible with man is possible with God." With each movement from one to the next, the point becomes increasingly evident. Justification, Kingdom citizenship, and eternal life cannot be earned; they can only be received by grace through humble, dependent trust in God.

The progression of passages opens with a description of the sin condition in the hearers Jesus is addressing. They are people who "trust in themselves that they were righteous and treated others with contempt" (verse 9). It seems (although this is not certain) that Jesus was addressing the Pharisees. The reader is left to conclude that, but then the target is made clear in verse 15. Not even the disciples are exempt from this kind of sinful thinking, despite what we might think of ourselves. Then Luke brings in a case study — a Law-keeping rich person who most would think surely must be bound for the Kingdom. Jesus exposes the problem in the rich man. He is trusting in himself (or his riches and his performance), which brings us right back to the opening problem. The remedy is found in Jesus' words in verse 22. "Follow me." Jesus reaffirms this solution in verse 28 when Peter, seeking assurance that they are on the right track, says, "We have followed you." Entrance into the Kingdom of God depends not on human merit, status, or possessions, but on humble, dependent faith in Christ, who is ultimate in merit, status, works, and possessions.

Verses 9-13 contrast self-righteousness and legalistic thinking with genuine humility and repentance. It shows that true justification comes only by God's mercy, not human righteousness. We need what Luther called an "alien righteousness," that is, one that comes from outside ourselves. It's foreign to us. Verses 15-17 raise the bar and increase the pressure, first by showing that the disciples are not free from the problem, and second, by demonstrating that the Kingdom belongs to those who receive it like a helpless child, which requires utter dependence on God and humility to realize this truth. Finally, verses 18-30 show the impossibility of entering the Kingdom by one's own achievements or possessions. It's as impossible as a one-ton camel going through a pinhole most seniors can't even see! Without the previous two sections, it might be easy to think that it's impossible to enter the Kingdom by works and money, but that doesn't capture the complete picture of impossibility here. It's impossible to be genuinely humble without Jesus. It's impossible to be truly dependent on God without Jesus.

The end of the first two sections drop hits at the central point in verse 27. Verses 14 and 17 anchor in the significance of humility. It is the humble who enter the Kingdom, but with man, entry is impossible. It is only the one who truly humbled himself and perfectly submitted himself to God--even to death on a cross--who can enter the Kingdom. And it is only by his work and status that he freely credits to us, while even taking on our sinful work and sinful status, which makes a way for us to enter the Kingdom.

The Law exposes our failures, but the only solution is found in the grace Jesus extends to us. In the illustration of the little children, we're supposed to relate most to the babies. It's not enough to think we're winning if we're disciples who let the babies come to Jesus. We're instructed to be like the babies! They are the heroes of the story (without even trying, because if they try, they are no longer totally dependent on one outside themselves). Luke shows us the wonder of God's grace — the impossible made possible through Jesus Christ. "With man it is impossible, but not with God. For all things are possible with God" (Mark 10:27).

"Yours, Mine, Ours": A Tool to Help Churches Find Balance

Every church must make decisions about how to utilize its limited time and resources for the benefit of the entire church. What ministries get the prime announcement time? What new things should the church do, and how should the leaders of the church decide in a sea of the congregation’s suggestions? How do leaders decide? The leadership tool, “Yours, Mine, Ours,” is an approach every leader should know and put into practice. In addition, church members will be substantially more helpful to his or her leadership when they too understand the “Yours, Mine, Ours” principle. That’s the topic of this episode of Salty Believer Unscripted. Listen wherever you get podcasts, or listen here:

Subscribe to the Salty Believer Unscripted on your favorite podcast app, or use these links:
RSS FeedApple Podcasts | iTunes  | Amazon Music | Audible | Player FM | iHeartRADIO | Pocket Casts | Castbox | Podbean | Good Pods | Spotify | Podcast Addict | Pandora | Podchaser | Listen Notes | YouTube

Paid Content?

What should we think about preachers who are switching to paid content sermons behind a pay wall? What about podcasts or special content that requires subscriptions? In this episode, Bryan Catherman and Josiah Walker discuss a listener’s question about preachers switching to a fee-based content model. Listen to this episode wherever you get podcasts or listen here:

Subscribe to the Salty Believer Unscripted on your favorite podcast app, or use these links:
RSS FeedApple Podcasts | iTunes  | Amazon Music | Audible | Player FM | iHeartRADIO | Pocket Casts | Castbox | Podbean | Good Pods | Spotify | Podcast Addict | Pandora | Podchaser | Listen Notes | YouTube