An Example of the Near-Far Approach to Prophecy

More than a thousand pages have been published about Isaiah 7:14. It's an exciting and hotly debated verse, mainly because Matthew quoted it (from the LXX) about being filled by the birth of Jesus. 

"Therefore, the Lord himself will give you a sign: See, the virgin will conceive, have a son, and name in Immanuel" (Isaiah 7:14, CSB). 

I can say with great assurance that this verse was fulfilled when Mary was engaged to Joseph but became pregnant from the Holy Spirit. Her husband (Joseph) was righteous but going to divorce her quietly. But then an angel of the Lord appeared to Joseph in a dream and told Joseph that the baby was from the Holy Spirit. Joseph was told not to be afraid and that he must name the baby Jesus. Jesus, Joseph was told, will save his people from their sins. (See Matthew 1:18-21.) How do I know? Because Matthew said "all this" referring to what I just told you, "took place to fulfill what was spoken by the Lord through the prophet." Then he quotes Isaiah 7:14. 

Beyond what Matthew says, there are a lot of questions. 

First, the boy was NOT named Immanuel (neither was any newborn in the book of Isaiah), so in what way was 7:14 fulfilled? This tells me the fulfillment was not about the name itself but something more. 

Second, in Isaiah 7:14, the virgin named the child. In Matthew, Joseph was commanded to name the child. Furthermore, Matthew says, "they will name him Immanuel." Who is the "they"? His parents on the 8th day of his birth, or others? Is this about giving him his name or identifying him as Immanuel (which means "God with us" or "God is with us.") And then Joseph names Mary's baby Jesus, which is the Greek way to say Joshua, meaning "God is salvation," "God is deliverance," or "God saves."

Third, the prophetic statement was a sign to Ahaz about something he was to see so he would know to trust God (which he wasn't doing). God gave that prophecy through Isaiah sometime around 734-735 BC. If verse 15 means that before the boy eats solid foods (customarily the foods of the Promised Land), Aram and Israel would be destroyed, it's worth noting that Assyria sacked both those cities just a couple of years later. It's also helpful to consider that Isaiah 7:14 had to be fulfilled in some way during the life of Ahaz, or it calls God's reliability into question.

Fourth, it's rather curious that Isaiah and the prophetess (most likely his wife) gave birth to a child, and this is stated immediately following the prophetic sign to Ahaz. But God didn't tell Isaiah to name him Immanuel (like the situation with Joseph). Instead, he called him Maher-shalal-hash-baz (Isaiah 8:3-4). That name means "hurry spoil, be swift plunder." Before this child could speak, The king of Assyria would have the spoils of Damascus and Samaria. This looks a lot like a fulfillment (although maybe not the ultimate fulfillment) of Isaiah 7:14. Furthermore, we don't have Scripture or extra-biblical material where a prophet's wife is called a prophetess, unless she was indeed a called prophetess. We don't have anything suggesting Isaiah was married to a prophetess or that she was saying anything recorded in the Bible. HOWEVER, some commentators believe Isaiah saw her as the fulfillment of the Word of God and, thus, a living prophetess by example and act. 

Fifth, Isiah's wife wasn't a virgin like Mary, was she? How could she be the near fulfillment if she wasn't a virgin? Some suggest that she may have been a virgin at the time of the prophecy. Others point out the strange and challenging translation issues between the Hebrew and the Greek Septuagint. The Hebrew was a bit more ambiguous. The translators of the LXX went with an unambiguous word, "virgin," in 132 B.C. The word fits within the range of meaning, but it was on the fringes. However, it ended up being exactly right in reference to Mary. 

It's worth noting that there are many child references in this section of Isaiah. (7:3, 8:1-5, 8:18, 9:6-7; 10:19; 11:6, and 11:8) Why? Why is God using children and children being born as illustrations? Why are they signs? 

It's also worth noting that the issue in Isaiah had everything to do with trusting the Lord. Two strong nations were baring down on Judah. They were doomed to destruction. Yet God was calling his people to trust him. He would be with them. He would bring their salvation. Indeed, Matthew may have been tying destruction and salvation to the fulfillment, but just in case we missed it, a virgin would have a baby, and THEY would call him "God is with us." 

A couple of weeks ago, we discussed the near-far views of prophecy. This prophecy is an excellent example of near and far fulfillment. Isaiah and Ahaz were likely amazed by the near fulfillment and never realized there was a more wonderful far fulfillment. We get the benefit of seeing how God used the near fulfillment as an illustration and further explanation to help us understand the far fulfillment.

Outreach or Feeding the Stomach God?

A church should be doing outreach (Matthew 28:18-20). We should be concerned about the well-being of our community (Jeremiah 29:7). We should be caring for widows and orphans, right? (James 1:27). And we are called to feed the hungry, shelter the stranger, clothe the naked, care for the sick, and visit those in prison (Matthew 25:35-40). How are we doing?  

Do the verses I just shared mean that every child in a poor school district should get a free backpack full of school supplies? Should every church have a food pantry and a prison ministry? Are we to pay the rent of every homeless person or soon-to-be evictee who walks through the church doors? How many orphans can we adopt? Should we raise volunteers to build and run an orphanage? Are we called to raise funds to create a new hospital?    

I think the Bible's answer is. . . maybe. 

After Jesus had been teaching and preaching all day, he challenged his disciples to feed five thousand men, plus women and children (John 6:1-7). They couldn't, but then Jesus did. If we stopped there, we'd have a good argument for feeding people and nothing more. But there's a lot more to this biblical account. Let us consider Jesus' words to those same people the next day.  

When the large crowds found Jesus again, he rebuked them. He said, "Truly I tell you, you are looking for me, not because you saw the signs, but because you ate the loaves and were filled. Don't work for the food that perishes, but for the food that lasts for eternal life, which the Son of Man will give you, because God the Father has set his seal of approval on him" (John 6:26-27). Let us not forget that John said the signs that were recorded in the book of John serve to cause one to believe and have eternal life" (John 20:30-31). The feeding was among the signs, but they didn't seek Jesus because of the signs; they just wanted more bread.  

Furthermore, after missing the feeding sign, the people challenged Jesus to produce another sign and pointed out that Moses gave a sign by providing hungry people with manna (John 6:30-31).  

Jesus told the people that he is the bread of life, and they've already been given a sign. They had the Law and Prophets, and they just saw a miracle and heard Jesus' preaching, yet they still didn't believe. Even if someone came back from the dead to warn them, they wouldn't believe (Luke 16:31). Jesus told them how they could have eternal life, yet they grumbled, complained, and rejected Jesus (see John 6:30-66). The people were pleased enough to have their stomachs filled for another day but unwilling to give any thought to salvation or their eternal future (Philippians 3:19). 

Why did Jesus feed all these people?  

For the same reason. This is why Christians serve their community, tend to widows and orphans, feed the hungry, shelter the homeless, provide clothing, and visit people in prison. This is the foundation for social justice. It is a sign. It is so Jesus can be seen and people will have the opportunity to believe.  

If we give poor children school supplies, provide a thirsty person a cup of cold water, or visit people in prison because we see them and love them, we may demonstrate that we have a righteous heart. The unrighteous missed the suffering of their fellow humans and were numbered among the goats (Matthew 25:31-46). These are good acts, but let us be careful not to think these acts earn the righteous their salvation when they are only outward signs. Remember that these examples in Matthew 25 are not acts of outreach and evangelism.   

Having compassion for the least of these is good. But if we serve them so we can pat ourselves on the back and say, "See what we did in the Lord's name," we may be in great danger (Matthew 7:21-23). If our actions are for a photo opportunity, then we have our reward now, rather than in heaven; frankly, we've used the least of these to make ourselves look and feel righteous. We may not humbly see those who were suffering in a way that honors Jesus but instead see them as a means of promoting our self-righteous service.  

However, if we start by seeing the greatest needs of our neighbors (i.e., their eternal damnation) and do everything we can to share Jesus' message of salvation and hope with them, we may actually help them. It might be that a backpack full of school supplies or a bag of food, or a hospital helps us achieve this primary goal. Then we don't get excited about giving a child a backpack but instead use it like a door hanger or the 15-second story with the hope of sharing the gospel. The opportunity to see a child pass from spiritual death to spiritual life should drive our excitement for service.  

When it comes to outreach and evangelism, we must start with the gospel and evaluate our efforts by what will allow us to share the gospel. Maybe it's a series of steps. Giving a gift of support may enable us to hear a person's story and invite her to church, where she may listen to the gospel. Or it could be that it takes a few months of smaller steps. But we must have a clear idea of how the effort leads to sharing the gospel, or we've not helped them with their greatest need. Even worse, we may have simply enabled them to chase after Jesus to fill their belly and reject Jesus simultaneously. If we're not careful, we may facilitate a worse attitude toward Jesus and his Church--the ATM that doles out money if you have a big enough sob story.  

The answer to this problem is found at the conclusion of the story of the feeding of the five thousand. It's John 6:67-71. We're called to make disciples. John 6:68-69 is what a disciple says. Our outreach and evangelism should be set with that aim in mind. If we start with the gospel and measure by our efforts for the gospel (rather than the number of meals passed out), we'll do a lot more than feeding the people's physical hunger for a day; but as Jesus demonstrated, that's not a wrong step along the way. We have to keep the right things in the right priorities as we go.   

Pastors in Rhino Skin

"If you're going to be a pastor today," said the retired pastor sitting across the bistro table, "you've got to have skin as thick as a rhinoceros." It was one of those statements you hear echoing from the still places for days.

He wasn't talking about the mean words or unkind name-calling from the one-time guest or social media jabs. Those are easy. He wasn't even referring to that one difficult person that's always the thorn in the pastor's side. Nope. He was referring to the well-meaning people of the church with their various opinions and convictions that are precisely the opposite of the views and beliefs of other well-meaning people in the church.

I pastor a small church full of wonderful people. Yet, even in the church I'm a part of, there are Republicans and Democrats, home-schoolers and public school teachers, serious environmentalists and those still unconcerned. We have people who are convinced the rapture is happening next week, while others don't hold that view of the rapture or think that the lack of Oreos on the shelf is a sign of armageddon. Six-day creation and creation over thousands of years is a conversation just under the surface, waiting to bubble up into any conversation for some. I've met with people still worried about the dangers of CRT, while another would like to see more done and preached about racism and is convinced CRT is a reasonable way to think about the problem. Some argue with me that Christians shouldn't own guns, while on the other side of the wall, people are showing their friends pictures of their newest gun purchase.

On one Sunday I was told how wonderful it was that we had teenagers helping collect the offering with their parents, while at the same time, others were grabbing my attention to voice their offense that teens weren't dressed nicely enough to serve. Some like the rawness of my preaching, while others don't want specific words ever said in my sermons again. (At the top of the list are poo, Hitler, and nincompoop.) Some love the word studies and want to hear the Greek and Hebrew words, while others say that's the point when they check out because it's over their heads and not for regular people. I'm told we need to do more with our denomination, while others say, "Let's do less; who needs it." We're not doing enough to keep our kids' safe while at the same time, complaints come that we're too strict for being a little church.

When I need to make a decision, people will be unhappy—every time.

The challenges and the need for rhinoceros skin are not the people. It's the temptations. It's tempting to try to make the most people happy, or everyone if possible. Listening to the squeakiest wheel is easy, but pastors must listen to God. There's the temptation to try to protect unity when controversial topics arise in a dinner conversation, spoken with authority as if everyone around the table agrees on the latest issue. Letting the church bring drama into our faith family is not easy. The temptation is to try to be the peacekeeper. I want to protect the teens, shy ones, new Christians, and those who are sensitive to the issues. It's equally tempting to excuse myself from the table and check out. It's no wonder some pastors become aloof or have no friends at the church. It's no wonder some pastors never share their personal opinions or views.

It's not the outsiders' problems brought to the church that keep the pastor up at night. It's not the world beyond the walls that make the task so challenging. It's the world of the members in the pews, Sunday to Sunday. It’s the stark differences. This is the work that requires thick skin and firm resolve. Is it any more difficult today than it was in the past? I don't think so. But the statement remains true. Anyone wanting to pastor today must have skin as thick as a rhinoceros.

Tools for Better Bible Study: The Biggest Story Bible Storybook

Join Josiah Walker and Bryan Catherman as they discuss Kevin DeYoung’s newest project, The Biggest Story Bible Storybook. It’s illustrated by Don Clark. How can a children’s Bible help adults study the Bible better? How might this Bible assist parents in the task of discipling their children to know and follow the Lord? Would this be a good resources in a church, and if so, how? In this episode of Salty Believer Unscripted, the guys discus these questions and more. Listen wherever you enjoy your favorite podcasts, or listen here:

Subscribe to the Salty Believer Unscripted on your favorite podcast app, or use these links:
RSS Feed | Google Podcasts | Apple Podcasts | iTunes | Amazon Music | Player FM | Stitcher | iHeartRADIO | Audible | Pocket Casts | Castbox | Podbean | Spotify | Podcast Addict

Tools for Better Bible Study: The Jesus Storybook Bible

Join Josiah Walker and Bryan Catherman as they discuss the Jesus Storybook Bible by Sally Lloyd-Jones and illustrated by Jago. How can a good children’s Bible help adults to study the Bible better? Will any children’s Bible do? Why this particular children’s Bible? They answer these questions and many more in this episode of Salty Believer Unscripted. Listen to this episode, “The Jesus Storybook Bible” wherever you listen to your favorite podcasts, or listen here:

Subscribe to the Salty Believer Unscripted on your favorite podcast app, or use these links:
RSS Feed | Google Podcasts | Apple Podcasts | iTunes | Amazon Music | Player FM | Stitcher | iHeartRADIO | Audible | Pocket Casts | Castbox | Podbean | Spotify | Podcast Addict

Tools for Better Bible Study: The Life Connections Study Bible

In this episode of “Salty Believer Unscripted,” Josiah Walker and Bryan Catherman discuss the Life Connections Study Bible by Lyman Coleman. This tool was previously known as the Serendipity Study Bible For Personal and Small Group Study. The guys like this study Bible, and they discuss how it can be best used for better Bible Study. This episode is part of a larger series that’s discussing good tools for studying the Bible. You can listen to the episode wherever you listen to podcasts or listen here:

Subscribe to the Salty Believer Unscripted on your favorite podcast app, or use these links:
RSS Feed | Google Podcasts | Apple Podcasts | iTunes | Amazon Music | Player FM | Stitcher | iHeartRADIO | Audible | Pocket Casts | Castbox | Podbean | Spotify | Podcast Addict

Tools for Better Bible Study: Sermon Podcasts

Join Bryan Catherman and Josiah Walker as they discuss tools for better Bible study. In this episode of Salty Believer Unscripted, they chat about sermon podcasts and the value of those podcasts for Bible study. Did you know you can use sermon podcasts like commentary? Listen to this episode and find out how. Listen wherever you listen to your favorite podcasts or listen here:

Subscribe to the Salty Believer Unscripted on your favorite podcast app, or use these links:
RSS Feed | Google Podcasts | Apple Podcasts | iTunes | Amazon Music | Player FM | Stitcher | iHeartRADIO | Audible | Pocket Casts | Castbox | Podbean | Spotify | Podcast Addict

Proverbs are Not Promises

Some people are shocked to learn that proverbs are not promises. It might have come as a surprise to you. But it's true.

The Bible is a collection of 66 books of differing genres. These include law, historical narrative, wisdom, prophetic, epistolatory, and apocalyptic literature. Different styles of writing show up within the individual books, which include narrative (telling of an event), poetry (song and artistic language), and prose (ordinary language to state information). As is the case when we read anything, we must understand the genre, style, context, and purpose.

Proverbs is wisdom literature. It's written within a poetic framework and style (which is why the formatting is not justified in many printings). The book itself tells us what it is right out of the gates. Proverbs 1:1-7 is critical to the understanding of the book. Solomon wrote it to his son, "for learning wisdom and discipline; for understanding insightful sayings." It goes on to say the book is to help the son understand a proverb or a parable as well as riddles. Verse seven is critical. It says, "The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge; fools despise wisdom and discipline."

From this point, Solomon uses two fictional characters to teach his points. These characters represent the life of wisdom and the life of folly, and they are both women. Wisdom is like a wonderful woman, and folly is like a tempting prostitute. There is practical teaching along the way, but the chief point is to teach the reader how to seek wisdom and avoid folly.

Solomon teaches and makes his points through chapter 9. Then, Chapter 10 offers a list and collection of saying and proverbs so the young learner can put to practice what he (or she) has learned.

The book concludes with the Proverbs 31 women. Take note; this is not a statement of precisely what a godly wife must be, although it's a good guide. Remember how the book started? There's a wonderful woman named wisdom and a terrible woman called folly. We've gotten to the end of the book and look at the reward. It's a wonderful woman! One would be wise to find this wife (wisdom) rather than folly.

As you read all those proverbs between Chapter 10 through Chapter 29, it's wise to say before the statement, "It is wise. . ."

These proverbs are not promises of God. God is not promising that if you "start a youth out on his way, even when he grows old he will not depart from it" (22:6). Ask King David, whose son tried to kill him and overthrow the king. But when faced with options, IT IS WISE to raise up your child in the way he should go. 23:1 says the "drunkard and the glutton will become poor." We'll be sorely disappointed if we take that as a promise from God. But when we take it in its proper context, WE WOULD BE WISE to avoid associating with "those who drink much wine or those who gorge themself on meat" because (or for) "the drunkard and the glutton will become poor, and the grogginess will clothe them in rags" (23:20-21). There is a principle here for prudent living, which isn't to have only vegetarian friends who don't drink. It's that associating with undisciplined friends may lead you to laziness too. It would be wise to associate with disciplined people.

We're back to the original point: proverbs are not promises. They are statements for prudent living, and we would be wise to learn their lessons and live by them.

Tools for Better Bible Study: The NET Bible

Join this episode of Salty Believer Unscripted at Josiah Walker and Bryan Catherman discuss how to use the NET Bible for better Bible study. The New English Translation Bible (NET) uses a translation theory that’s geared specifically for language study. It is also loaded with thousands of translation notes. You can find a free copy and online here. Listen to this episode wherever you listen to your favorite podcasts, or listen on the player below. We also encourage you to subscribe to the podcast so yo never miss an episode.

Subscribe to the Salty Believer Unscripted on your favorite podcast app, or use these links:
RSS Feed | Google Podcasts | Apple Podcasts | iTunes | Amazon Music | Player FM | Stitcher | iHeartRADIO | Audible | Pocket Casts | Castbox | Podbean | Spotify | Podcast Addict

Tools for Better Bible Study: Study Bible

Join Josiah Walker and Bryan Catherman as they discuss how to use a study Bible to get more out of your Bible study. This episode is part of a series called “Tools for Better Bible Study.” You can listen to this episode wherever you listen to your favorite podcasts, or listen here:

In addition, here’s a video that will help you pick a good study Bible.

Subscribe to the Salty Believer Unscripted on your favorite podcast app, or use these links:
RSS Feed | Google Podcasts | Apple Podcasts | iTunes | Amazon Music | Player FM | Stitcher | iHeartRADIO | Audible | Pocket Casts | Castbox | Podbean | Spotify | Podcast Addict

Is Dobbs 'Mission Accomplished'?

Roe v. Wade is overtunred. So is Planned Parenthood of Southern PA v. Casey. Praise the Lord! We should be thrilled, but should we be so quick to declare the victory so many want this to be?  Dobbs is a good step in the right and necessary direction, but it's only a step. It's a win for the constitution, but it's difficult to tell what the eternal impact might be.  

On May 1, 2003, President Bush stood on an aircraft carrier and gave the "Mission Accomplished" speech. That day, President Bush declared the end to major operations in Iraq. It wasn't just a political stunt. Previously, Congress gave the President the authority to attack Iraq and Iraq was the identified enemy. But what happens when America wants to be allied with Iraqi citizens and rebuild a nation? Iraq can't be the enemy anymore. Therefore, it was time to line an aircraft carrier with sailors and declare a victory speech that would legally change things. The Geneva Convention rules of war change when the enemy is no longer a nation but insurgents. POWs become detainees. Things changed, but the war went on. Many more soldiers were wounded or killed after the victory speech than before. 

On the same day we read the Dobbs decision, we can read articles about Planned Parenthood being "inconvenienced" to have to arrange transportation for women needing an abortion in a neighboring state. People are offering money to help with the travel and housing costs. Did Dobbs stop abortions today? Probably not many.  

What Dobbs did do was change the rules.   

On the first page of the Dobbs ruling, we find the following verdict: "The Constitution does not confer a right to abortion; Roe and Casey are overruled; and the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people and their elected representatives."    

Obtaining an abortion is not a constitutional right. Therefore, legislative bodies in all 50 states may regulate the practice one way or another. In addition, the US Congress can get involved. Although the federal government can't make abortion legal or illegal, Congress may be able to provide individuals with funding, assistance, or something like this. In any case, abortion is in the hands of many legislators.  

At this point, some states have outlawed abortions altogether. Other states are offering travel vouchers to come and get an abortion. It's about to get more crazy across the US. States could flip-flop depending on who's in office and what happens to attitudes toward abortion in the future. One state could make it illegal to get an abortion at any point in the pregnancy, while another could give the green light to extremely late-term or partial-birth abortions.  Pregnant women are free to travel from one state to another.

The Supreme Court did not declare that an unborn child is afforded the rights as a human under the Constitution of the United States. Children do not yet have that kind of protection, and many Americans--voters and legislators alike--still do not see an unborn child as a person of any value whatsoever. There's still much work to be done, and at present, it has to happen in 50 legislatures over and over and over again. Although today is a victory, it's not over. The baton was passed to another generation, but there are still miles of running ahead. 

What has not changed is the need for thousands of parentless children to be adopted. These children were born before Dobbs. They need parents just as much today as they did yesterday, and there will be more tomorrow. And more the day after that. Not only will children need parents, but God must also move in people's hearts to become adoptive parents, and then God must keep moving in the hearts of more and more people to adopt as the days and years continue to produce parentless children locally and around the world.     

Discussions about preventing unwanted pregnancies must happen, including the value and abstinence and the godly wisdom of avoiding sex outside marriage. Sex and the sexual revolution cannot be valued above the cost of human life, and this happens best when God transforms hearts and minds to his will and ways. This was true before Dobbs, and it's still true now. Children must be discipled in godly homes. Christians must encourage and proclaim salvation and sanctification rather than behavior modification. Legislation has never brought the kind of justice that Jesus' salvation and sanctification bring to a community.  

Christians must continue to pray for our leaders, vote for godly leaders of godly character, and run for office if called upon to serve. Dobbs didn't change that, but it did make it more significant regarding abortion. However, Christians must also remember that the government's arm is far weaker than the Lord's. God raises and tears down governments. There is no authority that God does not give. Let us continue to pray and put our hope in God.    

Pregnant teens and the boys who impregnated them still need Jesus. Rape victims still need Jesus. The world still needs Jesus. A Supreme Court outcome is not the gospel, and state laws are not the eternal hope the world needs. Only the transformative power of Jesus Christ saving and sanctifying souls gives the world what it needs and brings about the fundamental changes we want to see.  Dobbs didn't change that. But the good news is Jesus can. Let us pray and share Jesus with the world.

We should be thankful for Dobbs. Praise the Lord! But let us not think this is the end. In the scope of God's Kingdom, this is just another step. In the reality of a lost world in rejection of God, we have a substantially bigger commission. We must pray for the end of abortion in our world, and let us hope Dobbs gets us closer to that reality, but let us pray even more for God to be glorified because the world worships and enjoys him.  

Tools for Better Bible Study: Bible Reading Plans

Join Bryan Catherman and Josiah Walker as they discuss tools for better Bible study. In this episode they discuss Bible reading plans because the Bible is the best tool for understanding the Bible. Context is key. And the Bible offers the best commentary on the Bible. Knowing the Bible helps the reader get more out of studying the Bible. Listen to this episode of Salty Believer Unscripted here:

Download one of these reading plans if you don’t have one:
Chronological Bible Reading List
New Testament Reading Checklist
Survey of the Entire Bible in 40 Days
The Bible in 180 Chapters

Subscribe to the Salty Believer Unscripted on your favorite podcast app, or use these links:
RSS Feed | Google Podcasts | Apple Podcasts | iTunes | Amazon Music | Player FM | Stitcher | iHeartRADIO | Audible | Pocket Casts | Castbox | Podbean | Spotify | Podcast Addict

Illustrating Well by Jim Wilson

Illustrations can be and effective and important part of preaching, if used well. Unfortunately, most preachers either rely too heavily on them or don’t use them at all. When used poorly, illustrations can distract from the aim of the sermon.

Illustrating Well: Preaching Sermons that Connect by Jim Wilson (Lexham Press, 2022) is a great resource for preachers trying to get a better idea how to use illustrations effectively. Dr. Wilson is a professor and the Director of the DMin program at Gateway Seminary. In addition, he is a long-time preacher, pastor, and he has author many books. He is passionate about preaching and training others to preach well.

Bryan Catherman offers an introduction and recommendation of the book in this short video:

Purchase Illustrating Well: Preaching Sermons that Connect wherever you get your favorite books or click the link to find it on Amazon.com. You can find more book recommendations at SaltyBeliever.com or on our YouTube channel.

Tools for Better Bible Study: Blue Letter Bible

In this episode of Salty Believer Unscripted, Josiah Walker and Bryan Catherman discuss Blue Letter Bible, found at BlueLetterBible.org. This is a free resource that serves as a collection of study tools. It includes cross references, a Strong’s concordance, lexicons, dictionaries, commentaries, original languages, various translations, and even links to sermons preached on the Text in question. Listen to this episode of Salty Believer Unscripted here:

The guys mention a screen cast so listeners have the opportunity to see the resources. You can watch that here:

Subscribe to the Salty Believer Unscripted on your favorite podcast app, or use these links:
RSS Feed | Google Podcasts | Apple Podcasts | iTunes | Amazon Music | Player FM | Stitcher | iHeartRADIO | Audible | Pocket Casts | Castbox | Podbean | Spotify | Podcast Addict

SBC Entities Should Consider an Addition to their Trustee Boards

Forty-three thousand churches are cooperating with the Southern Baptist Convention. You'll find at least one in nearly every city across America, yet the SBC has a decidedly "southern" flavor. That's because, in part, most of the churches are in the south. There are far fewer SBC affiliated churches in the west and the north-eastern parts of the country. And for the most part, those churches are a lot smaller. But the SBC hugs her southern roots.

It wouldn't take much for the SBC to become more diverse. She simply needs to open the doors to those voices in smaller conventions. Churches in Alaska, Wyoming, Utah, Idaho, Maine, Montana, and the Dakotas, for example, are faithfully working to plant SBC churches, give to the Corporative Program (CP), and partner with other SBC-minded churches. Yet, they have little to no representation on the boards of trustees of our SBC entities.  

Except for the Executive Committee (EC) and the International Mission Board (IMB), the entities limit their board of trustees to larger state conventions rather than smaller ones in missional areas. In doing so, they miss the opportunity to have diverse men and women on their team.  

Every year, a team called the Committee on the Committees is appointed to select a group who in turn nominates trustees for the various SBC entities. That second team is called the Committee on Nominations. Two people are chosen from each of the 42 state conventions (some states are two or three states combined) to sit on the Committee on Committees. They each nominate a person from within their state (or 2-state) area to serve on the Committee on Nominations. When trustee positions become vacant, this team selects people to fill the slots. Yet, smaller conventions can only send someone to the EC and the IMB.  

Why does it matter if the smaller conventions don't get to send someone to serve on the entities' board of trustees?  

It doesn't. Not if churches in those smaller states are only expected to send in their CP dollars and enjoy the southern flavor and decisions of the SBC. It doesn't matter if the entities are unconcerned about the ideas and voices of the Christians in these missional areas. And none of this should matter if the entities can't find ways to utilize trustees all over our country.  

As a pastor in Utah and the former President of the Utah-Idaho Southern Baptist Convention, I greatly appreciate the possibility of chatting with the trustee serving with the IMB and the trustee serving with the EC at a local event or convention meeting. I know they understand our context and concerns. They are one of us, and I believe there's a greater chance that they'll hear us. My friendship with a former IMB trustee actually increased my interest and concern for the IMB's work. I felt more compelled to send financial resources and open our building for IMB meetings and work in our area because of the trustee from my area.   

I look forward to seeing these trustees at our next state convention and hear reports from them, people we know, and our friends. I wish the Ethics and Religious Liberties Commission (ERLC), LifeWay, GuideStone, and the North American Mission Board (NAMB) would see the value of having a trustee from every state convention sitting on their board. Maybe they could take a page from the IMB's playbook?  

It would be healthy and beneficial to have a trustee from every state convention area. In some cases, this only means adding another half-dozen trustees to bring the full number of trustees up to 42. 

I would also love to see someone from Utah or Idaho on the board of trustees at Gateway Seminary. They are the closest seminary to us regionally, and we have a Gateway teaching site in Salt Lake. Yet, while their board has members from eastern states in larger conventions, there's no representation from Idaho or Utah. I understand that including a trustee from every convention could conflict with accreditation requirements; however, it does seem reasonable that SBC churches closer to the seminaries should be considered.   

The messengers at the convention can't demand other entities make these changes, but they can request the entities' board of trustees explore the possibilities. I certainly hope a motion is made to consider this at the 2022 Southern Baptist Convention in Anaheim, California. It will simply be forwarded to the entities, but that may be enough. (I'd make the motion myself if rising travel costs didn't prevent me.) But if it doesn't happen, I pray that the boards themselves may take up this issue and make their entity more inclusive of Southern Baptists from the entire United States and beyond.       

If you're attending the next Southern Baptist Convention and agree with what you've read, consider pre-filing your motion (it’s on the app and it’s helpful but not required), getting in line at the mic, and then making this motion. I, and many others in under-represented areas, would be grateful. 

Here's how that motion could go: 

Name, Messenger from _____ Church, from _______.

Following the example set by the Executive Committee and the International Mission Board of having representation from each cooperating state convention, I move that the messengers to the 20__ SBC annual meeting request the Boards of Trustees of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, Gateway Seminary, Guidestone Financial Resources, Lifeway Christian Resources, Midwestern Seminary, New Orleans Seminary, the North American Mission Board, Southeastern Seminary, Southwestern Seminary, and The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary study the feasibility of permanently adding at least one properly nominated and elected trustee from each unrepresented, cooperating state convention and report the findings back to the 20__ SBC annual meeting.

A Great Free Tool: Blue Letter Bible

Blue Letter Bible is a free, online resource for detailed Bible study. At the other end of a click, it offers Strongs key numbers, original languages and the LXX, cross references, a concordance, lexicons, dictionaries, commentaries, links to preaching and preachers, and more. Most of the resources are of high quality, especially given that they are free. Blue Letter Bible is a good resource for anyone wanting to study the Bible, and it should be in the toolbox of Sunday School teachers, those writing devotionals, and even preachers who were previously short on resources.

Here’s a 10-minute screencast to introduce you to Blue Letter Bible:

Find more tools and resources on our website, here. You might also benefit from subscribing to our YouTube channel and our podcast, Salty Believer Unscripted.

Charles Simeon: The Luther of Cambridge

By Josiah D. Walker
(This post was originally a paper written for the partial fulfillment of a Master’s degree at Gateway Seminary.)

INTRODUCTION

James instructs his readers to “Consider it a great joy […] whenever you experience various trials, because you know that the testing of your faith produces endurance.”[i] Charles Simeon must have taken this verse to heart. He withstood persecution that most of us would not be able to withstand. Not only did Simeon stand firm against persecution from his church members, but he also finished strong and endured until the end, having pastored at the same church, Trinity Church in Cambridge, England for 49 years.[ii]

John Piper describes Simeon as “a man who was a sinner like you and me, who was a pastor, and who, year after year, in his trials, ‘grew downward’ in humility and upward in his adoration of Christ, and who did not yield to bitterness or to the temptation to leave his charge – for 54 years.”[iii] In examining Simeon’s life, we see the selfless love that he had for Christ’s Bride, the church, despite the opposition and hatred that he endured; and as a result, we can learn how we too might love and serve Christ’s Bride faithfully as well. 

 

THE BIOGRAPHY OF CHARLES SIMEON

Charles Simeon was born in 1759, a year after Jonathan Edwards’s death. He was born to a middle-class family and was the youngest of four brothers. Not much is known about his mother. His father was a non-believer and a well-off attorney. Growing up, Simeon attended The Royal College of Eton, a boarding school in England. After which, he went on to King’s College in Cambridge in 1779. There, he became a Fellow in 1782. The following year, he was ordained as a priest and appointed as vicar of Holy Trinity Church in Cambridge. Simeon served as the Pastor of Trinity Church for forty-nine years until his death in 1836. According to Arthur Bennett, By the end of his life, Simeon had become “the strongest religious influence in England.”[iv]

Charles Simeon lived a simple life. He never married and spent his life living in the rooms at King’s College in Cambridge, England. When Simeon’s brother left him a substantial amount of money after his death, Simeon turned it down and gave any extra income that he received to other religious and charitable organizations.[v]

CONVERSION STORY

Many people know exactly when they were ‘saved.’ Others would say that they have been saved on the ‘installment plan’ because they have seen, over a period of time, the moments when God was working in their life to regenerate their heart and turn it from a heart of stone and into a heart of flesh. For Simeon, salvation came slowly step-by-step during Passion Week in 1779 when he was asked by his Provost, William Cooke, to take part in the mid-week Lord’s Supper. Simeon was beside himself. It is said that when Simeon was faced with the thought of taking part of the Lord’s Supper, he found himself feeling like Satan was better equipped to take part in communion than he. 

“In Passion Week,” writes Simeon regarding the time of his conversion, “as I was reading Bishop Wilson on the Lord’s Supper, I met with an expression to this effect — ‘That the Jews knew what they did, when they transferred their sin to the head of their offering.’”[vi]  Leviticus 1:4 discusses the transfer of sin to make an acceptable substitute. 

Simeon continued, “The thought came into my mind, what, may I transfer all my guilt to another? Has God provided an Offering for me, that I may lay my sins on His head? Then, God willing, I will not bear them on my own soul one moment longer.”[vii] 

Although Simeon was reading about the Lord’s Supper, it was this Old Testament passage that God used to stir the man’s mind. 

The thought stuck with Simeon. He continued, “Accordingly, I sought to lay my sins upon the sacred head of Jesus; and on the Wednesday began to have a hope of mercy; on the Thursday that hope increased; on the Friday and Saturday it became stronger; and on the Sunday morning, Easter-day, April 4, I awoke early with those words upon my heart and lips, ‘Jesus Christ is risen to-day! Hallelujah! Hallelujah!’”[viii] 

While not a common evangelistic Scripture for Easter, Simeon’s encounter with substitutionary atonement in the Old Testament Law helped him take step after step until he found his hope and salvation in Jesus Christ. Simeon describes the fruit of his salvation encounter, writing, “From that hour peace flowed in rich abundance into my soul; and at the Lord’s Table in our Chapel, I had the sweetest access to God through my blessed Savior.”[ix] 

PERSISTENCE IN THE FACE OF PERSECUTION

Charles Simeon was part of the Evangelical Party, which, like the Methodist Churches, “had been inspired by the preaching and example of John Wesley.”[x] In fact, Simeon became friends with John Wesley during the early days of his ministry.[xi] 

Charles Simeon preached his first sermon at Trinity Church November 10th, 1782.[xii] It was his dream come true. He had long hoped to become the vicar of Trinity Church. For years he had petitioned God in prayer that he might be able to pastor there, as well as teach at the University.[xiii]

Unfortunately, that dream quickly darkened into a nightmare. Simeon had been appointed to the pastorate by Bishop Yorke; however, the congregation of Trinity Church had a different desire. They wanted the Assistant Curate at the time, Mr. Hammond, to be their pastor. In hearing this news, Simeon was willing to step down as vicar so the parishioners could have the pastor that they desired; however, Bishop Yorke told Simeon that even if he stepped down as vicar, the bishop would not appoint Hammond as the new vicar. Therefore, Simeon remained the pastor for fifty-four years. Ironically, it took almost that long for the congregation to come around to the idea of having him as their pastor.  

Simeon faced ruthless opposition from his protesting parishioners. For the first five years of Simeon’s ministry, the congregation did not allow him to preach the Sunday afternoon service. Instead, they handed that service over to Mr. Hammond. Then after Hammond left, rather than relenting and allowing Simeon to preach, the church gave the service over to someone else for an additional seven years. It wasn’t until 1792, twelve years after joining Trinity church, that Charles Simeon was allowed to preach the afternoon sermon. If only that were where the conflict ended. 

In addition to refusing to allow Simeon the opportunity to preach in the church that he pastored, the ‘pewholders’ of the church also locked the doors on their personal pews and would not allow anyone to sit in their pews. As a result, Simeon set up chairs in the aisles and surrounding areas of the church, only to have them thrown out onto the lawn.[xiv] 

“For ten years, Simeon was harassed and persecuted at Trinity Church, Cambridge, by churchwardens and other church members who disliked having an Evangelical vicar.”[xv] Despite the on-slot of opposition that Simeon had endured for years, he continued faithfully preaching the Word and spending time in prayer, loving his congregation with patience and humility. Eventually, things relented, and Simeon enjoyed roughly thirty years of peace before more conflict would arise. 

UNIVERSITY LIFE

According to Zabriskie, “Simeon’s basic contentions became permanently the major premises of the Evangelical movement largely because of the immense influence he exerted for half a century over the students at Cambridge, many of whom became the chief clerical and lay leaders in future years, and through the Simeon Trust, which he created.”[xvi] Part of the blessing of living at the University, was that Simeon was able to have ‘conversation parties’ on Friday nights. These weeknight gatherings were an opportunity to gather together with other students who had questions about spirituality and their faith. In the end, these parties resulted in “scores of young men becoming evangelical pastors and missionaries,” according to Gordon MacDonald.[xvii] 

Simeon formed small groups long before today’s thinking of small groups ever existed. He also started Sunday School classes before the modern-day ‘Sunday School’ of the 1950s. In 1827, thanks to Simeon’s preaching, four students at the University organized a Sunday school for the less fortunate children in the area. The first week, 220 kids attended the class. It was soon known as “the Jesus Lane Sunday school”[xviii] This simple Sunday school class quickly resulted in other groups meeting, and in 1862 a Daily Prayer Meeting was started that drew a crowd of 10 students from the university. These prayer meetings included evangelistic messages, prayer, singing, and the reading of God’s Word. Fifteen years later, evangelical activity could be seen across Cambridge’s seventeen colleges and the Cambridge Inter-Collegiate Christian Union was formed to help students focus on missionary careers.[xix] The best part of it is this all started with just one man, Charles Simeon as there was no evangelical presence at Cambridge when Simeon started school there. 

LEAVING A LEGACY

“When Simeon died in 1836, the city of Cambridge closed down and gave him the largest funeral people had ever known,” wrote MacDonald[xx] Simeon refused to get caught up in titles such as Arminian or Calvinist. His main objective was to teach and preach the gospel biblically. While Simeon was commonly referred to as a “Evangelical Calvinist” you can dig deeper into his theology by reviewing his collection of sermons in a 21-volume set which he completed in 1833 and gave to King William the Fourth.[xxi] Simeon was an advisor for the East India Company and a mentor for Henry Martin. Simeon had a heart for missions and was involved with various mission organizations such as the Foreign Bible Society and the Society for Promotion Christianity Among Jews. Simeon was also instrumental in the foundation of the Church Missionary Society.[xxii]

WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM CHARLES SIMEON’S LIFE?

Examining the life of Charles Simeon, we see that Oswald Chambers was right when he said, “Prayer does not equip us for greater works--prayer is the greater work.”[xxiii] 

Simeon made it a daily ritual to get up at 4:00AM each morning to read the Bible, study, and pray until 8:00AM.[xxiv] It was this practice that helped equip him for a lifetime of ministry. Simeon understood that prayer changes things. It changes us. He prayed intensely for those who opposed him. When newspapers slandered him, his response was: “I will pray for him” and when the churchwardens locked the church doors against him, he said “May God bless them with enlightening grace.”[xxv] It was common to find Simeon silently praying for others. Once, a German agnostic rode up to him on a horse and asked why Simeon’s lips were silently moving. His response was “I am praying for you, my friend.” In the end, their conversation that ensued led to the conversion of the German agnostic. Simeon’s life was grounded in prayer, and it showed. 

Simeon faithfully served in ministry for over forty-nine years and overcome incredible hatred and opposition from not only his congregation but also the university where he taught at. He also conquered difficult health issues; through such adversity, we see that the keys to Simeon’s success came from God the Father. Simeon held fast to God’s Word. He was patient in tribulation and kind in persecution. He took James 1:3 to heart and lived it out each and every day. With laser focus, Simeon preached the redeeming message of the gospel everywhere he went. When faced with the opportunity to retire early and take it easy, Simeon hunkered down, and with his hand on the plow, continued to press forward in his kingdom work. When the time comes for the Lord to call us home, may the same words be said of us that are inscribed on the monument of Charles Simeon in Holy Trinity Church: “Determined not to know anything among you save Jesus Christ, and Him crucified.”[xxvi]

 Bibliography

  • Christian Standard Bible (CSB) Nashville, Tenn.: Holman Bible Publishers.

  • Bennett, Arthur. Charles Simeon: Prince of Evangelicals.  Evangelical Review of Theology 16, no. 2 (1992): 182–95.

  • Chambers, Oswald. My Utmost for His Highest. Grand Rapids, Mich: Discovery House Publishers, 1992.

  • Clayton, J F. 1936“The Centenary of Charles Simeon.” Modern Churchman 26 (9): 500–504. https://search-ebscohost-com.gbtssbc.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=lsdar&AN=ATLA0001649916&site=ehost-live.

  • Hansen, Collin “Campus Ministry Cambridge Style” Worchester, Penn: Christian History Institute, 2005 Issue #88

  • MacDonald, Gordon “I Am Sim” Worchester, Penn: Christian History Institute, 2004, Issue 81.

  • Moule, M.C.G. “Charles Simeon”. London: InterVarsity Press, 1948.

  • Piper, John.  21 Servants of Sovereign Joy: Faithful, Flawed, and Fruitful.  Wheaton, Ill: Crossway, 2018.

  • Zabriskie, Alexander C. “Charles Simeon: Anglican Evangelical.” Church History 9, no. 2 (1940): 103–19.

 

Endnotes

       [i] James 1:2-3. Christian Standard Bible (CSB). All following scripture references will be taken from the CSB. 

     [ii] John Piper, 21 Servants of Sovereign Joy: Faithful, Flawed, and Fruitful (Wheaton, Ill: Crossway, 2018), 299.

     [iii] John Piper, 21 Servants of Sovereign Joy: Faithful, Flawed, and Fruitful (Wheaton, Ill: Crossway, 2018), 320.

     [iv] Bennett, Arthur. 1992. “Charles Simeon: Prince of Evangelicals.” Evangelical Review of Theology 16 (2): 182–95.

     [v] John Piper, 21 Servants of Sovereign Joy: Faithful, Flawed, and Fruitful (Wheaton, Ill: Crossway, 2018), 317.

     [vi] M.C.G. Moule, Charles Simeon (London: InterVarsity Press, 1948) 25-26.

     [vii] M.C.G. Moule, Charles Simeon (London: InterVarsity Press, 1948) 25-26.

     [viii] M.C.G. Moule, Charles Simeon (London: InterVarsity Press, 1948) 25-26.

     [ix] M.C.G. Moule, Charles Simeon (London: InterVarsity Press, 1948) 25-26.

     [x] Clayton, J F. 1936“The Centenary of Charles Simeon.” Modern Churchman 26 (9): 500–504. https://search-ebscohost-com.gbtssbc.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=lsdar&AN=ATLA0001649916&site=ehost-live.

     [xi] Clayton, J F. 1936“The Centenary of Charles Simeon.” Modern Churchman 26 (9): 500–504. https://search-ebscohost-com.gbtssbc.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=lsdar&AN= ATLA0001649916&site=ehost-live.

     [xii] John Piper, 21 Servants of Sovereign Joy: Faithful, Flawed, and Fruitful (Wheaton, Ill: Crossway, 2018), 304.

     [xiii] John Piper, 21 Servants of Sovereign Joy: Faithful, Flawed, and Fruitful (Wheaton, Ill: Crossway, 2018), 309.

     [xiv] John Piper, 21 Servants of Sovereign Joy: Faithful, Flawed, and Fruitful (Wheaton, Ill: Crossway, 2018), 310.

     [xv] Clayton, J F. 1936 “The Centenary of Charles Simeon.” Modern Churchman 26 (9): 500–504. https://search-ebscohost-com.gbtssbc.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=lsdar&AN=ATLA0001649916&site=ehost-live.

     [xvi] Zabriskie, Alexander C. 1940. “Charles Simeon: Anglican Evangelical.” Church History 9 (2): 103–19.

     [xvii] Gordon MacDonald, “I Am Sim” (Worchester, Penn: Christian History Institute, 2004), Issue 81, 50.

     [xviii] Collin Hansen, “Campus Ministry Cambridge Style” (Worchester, Penn: Christian History Institute, 2005) Issue #88.

     [xix] Collin Hansen, “Campus Ministry Cambridge Style” (Worchester, Penn: Christian History Institute, 2005) Issue #88.

     [xx] Gordon MacDonald, “I Am Sim” (Worchester, Penn: Christian History Institute, 2004), Issue 81, 50.

     [xxi] John Piper, 21 Servants of Sovereign Joy: Faithful, Flawed, and Fruitful (Wheaton, Ill: Crossway, 2018), 305-306.

     [xxii] John Piper, 21 Servants of Sovereign Joy: Faithful, Flawed, and Fruitful (Wheaton, Ill: Crossway, 2018), 304.

     [xxiii] Oswald Chambers, My Utmost for His Highest (Grand Rapids, Mich: Discovery House Publishers, 1992) October 16.

     [xxiv] Zabriskie, Alexander C. 1940. “Charles Simeon: Anglican Evangelical.” Church History 9 (2): 103–19.

     [xxv] Bennett, Arthur. 1992. “Charles Simeon: Prince of Evangelicals.” Evangelical Review of Theology 16 (2): 182–95.

     [xxvi] Clayton, J F. 1936 “The Centenary of Charles Simeon.” Modern Churchman 26 (9): 500–504. https://search-ebscohost-com.gbtssbc.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=lsdar&AN=ATLA0001649916&site=ehost-live.

Mission Foundations: Isaiah 6:8

In this episode of Salty Believer Unscripted, Josiah Walker and Bryan Catherman discuss the heart of “Hear I am. Send me.” It’s the cry of Isaiah in Isaiah 6:8. It’s a good heart for mission work but we often take it out of context. The guys discuss the context and how much more significant the verse is for missions when we get it properly placed in passage. Listen to this episode, “Isaiah 6:8” wherever you listen to your favorite podcasts, or listen here:

Subscribe to the Salty Believer Unscripted on your favorite podcast app, or use these links:
RSS Feed | Google Podcasts | Apple Podcasts | iTunes | Amazon Music | Player FM | Stitcher | iHeartRADIO | Audible | Pocket Casts | Castbox | Podbean | Spotify | Podcast Addict

Why is "Sola Fide" so Significant?

In July 1505, a young lawyer entered an Augustinian monastery. It was a place isolated from the ills of the outside world. The only focus was intended to be God, every waking moment of every day. Yet this young man, even in the safety of the monastery, was tormented. He did not feel worthy of being in God's presence. He was anxious and desperate for an escape from his sins. He greatly feared the coming wrath of God. He had no idea how to live, not even from one moment to the next.

The young monk would confess to his confessor for hours and still be deeply troubled that he may have forgotten something. He knew that even one sin would damn him to hell, and even his sinful nature was a curse. The monk shook with fright when taking communion. Terror filled him at all times. Confession, escaping the evil world, serving as a monk, and meditating on God seemed unable to offer him one scrap of peace, rest, or salvation.

Seeing the monk's agony, his confessor believed the wretched monk might find relief if he were to go to the academy. At the academy, he would have greater access to the Bible, and he might have an opportunity to study God's Word more deeply. The monk was Martin Luther.

In 1515, Luther was lecturing on the Letter to the Romans. He later wrote, "that it was the first chapter of that epistle that he found the solution to his difficulties" (Justo Gonzalez, 1985, 19). Luther read Romans 1:16-17, which reads, "For I am not ashamed of the gospel, because it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, first to the Jew and also to the Greek. For in it the righteousness of God is revealed from faith to faith, just as it is written: 'The righteous shall live by faith'" (CSB).

Luther knew that the righteous are saved, and the unrighteous, that is, those without righteousness, are damned. In Romans 1:17, Luther finally understood that man has no righteousness of his own. He has none whatsoever and can't even create it (which is supported by the remainder of Romans 1). Nor can humanity do work to earn it because 'self-righteousness' can't save. Any righteousness Luther may receive could have only come from God. God has revealed his righteousness to his creation. Furthermore, God grants his righteousness to those who believe in God's revelation, the gospel. More striking, is that there is not one thing apart from faith that man can do for salvation. No work can earn this righteousness. Salvation comes by faith alone, in Christ alone.

Luther was liberated! His effort to earn his salvation through his own 'righteous' works now looked silly, futile. Martin Luther might have become a regenerate, born-again Christian at this moment. And it was most likely that God used this discovery to launch Luther into the ministry that reformed the world. Luther's discovery brought the focus to faith in God rather than working and striving to save ourselves.

Hebrews 11:1 teaches that "faith is the reality of what is hoped for." Faith is knowing that God will keep his promises to us. Then the entire chapter shares account after account of God keeping his promises and God's righteous people living their lives based on the rock-solid hope--faith--that God will do what he promised he would. And he does!

The righteous shall live by faith.

The truth Luther discovered in Romans 1:17 became one of five battle cries of the protestant reformation: Sola Fide! (It means 'in faith alone.')

Sola Fide!